Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 April 2002

• 01:04   Re: RI triggers and schemas Rod Taylor
• 02:07   Re: RI triggers and schemas Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:19   Re: RI triggers and schemas Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: RI triggers and schemas Stephan Szabo
• 04:07   Re: RI triggers and schemas Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:15   Re: RI triggers and schemas Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:32   Re: RI triggers and schemas Jan Wieck
• 13:32   Re: RI triggers and schemas Jan Wieck
• 13:33   Proposed patch for ODBC driver w/ C-a-n-c-e-l Bradley McLean
• 13:39   Re: RI triggers and schemas Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 14:16   Re: Data integrity and sanity check Jan Wieck
• 14:22   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 14:27   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: RI triggers and schemas Stephan Szabo
• 16:33   Re: RI triggers and schemas Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: RI triggers and schemas Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: RI triggers and schemas Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 16:34   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 16:38   Re: RI triggers and schemas Stephan Szabo
• 16:54   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 16:54   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 18:11   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 19:27   Re: timeout implementation issues Barry Lind
• 20:41   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 21:15   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: timeout implementation issues Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: timeout implementation issues Barry Lind
• 21:43   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 22:42   please apply patch Nicolas Bazin
• 23:54   inserting user defined types through a rule? Bear Giles

2 April 2002

• 00:58   Re: inserting user defined types through a rule? Tom Lane
• 02:39   serial and namespace Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:15   Re: inserting user defined types through a rule? Bear Giles
• 04:38   Re: serial and namespace Tom Lane
• 04:39   Re: Autoconf upgraded Albert Chin
• 04:51   Re: inserting user defined types through a rule? Tom Lane
• 06:22   Dblink and ISDN Darko Prenosil
• 06:59   Re: timeout implementation issues, lock timeouts Robert Schrem
• 07:13   Re: timeout implementation issues Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:41   Re: Proposed patch for ODBC driver w/ C-a-n-c-e-l Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:08   v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Marc G. Fournier
• 12:13   Re: v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Kaare Rasmussen
• 13:37   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Tom Lane
• 13:57   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Doug McNaught
• 14:21   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 15:04   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Vince Vielhaber
• 15:27   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Vince Vielhaber
• 15:50   Re: Dblink and ISDN Joe Conway
• 15:58   Re: mailing list problem Oleg Bartunov
• 15:58   Re: Dblink and ISDN Joe Conway
• 16:01   SET NOT NULL/DROP NOT NULL patch Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 16:03   SET NOT NULL / DROP NOT NULL as an HREF! Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 16:07   Threading in libpg on Solaris Martin Renters
• 16:10   Patch to add real cancel to ODBC driver Bradley McLean
• 16:13   escape sequence conflicting w/ backup (i.e. pg_dump) Matias Klein
• 16:14   hackers mail broken? Bradley McLean
• 16:22   Re: Dblink and ISDN Rod Taylor
• 16:25   ... Alex Lau
• 16:31   Re: Contrib update Bruce Momjian
• 16:38   status of IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types Reinoud van Leeuwen
• 16:39   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Richard Emberson
• 16:40   Re: [GENERAL] v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix Dean Hill
• 16:45   Re: How to give permission to others on data directory David Walker
• 16:49   Unicode ready? Kevin McPherson
• 17:04   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: Dblink and ISDN Joe Conway
• 17:52   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 17:54   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 18:00   Re: status of IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types Bruce Momjian
• 18:25   maxint reached? Daniel Kalchev
• 18:34   Re: Tom Lane
• 18:39   Re: maxint reached? Daniel Kalchev
• 19:07   Re: maxint reached? Tom Lane
• 19:11   Re: maxint reached? Daniel Kalchev
• 19:15   Re: maxint reached? Tom Lane
• 19:41   Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes Tom Lane
• 19:55   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes David Walker
• 19:57   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Joe Conway
• 20:46   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes Bradley McLean
• 20:54   Re: timeout implementation issues Barry Lind
• 22:55   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Peter Eisentraut
• 23:40   ANALYZE after restore Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:47   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Gavin Sherry
• 23:49   SHOW ALL as a query result Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:51   Re: ANALYZE after restore Neil Conway
• 23:51   Re: ANALYZE after restore Gavin Sherry

3 April 2002

• 00:57   Re: SHOW ALL as a query result Peter Eisentraut
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] timeout implementation issues 
• 01:44   Re: SHOW ALL as a query result Joe Conway
• 02:11   Re: ANALYZE after restore Tom Lane
• 02:26   BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:31   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:40   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Tom Lane
• 02:54   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Neil Conway
• 03:20   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Tom Lane
• 03:45   Odd psql \i behaviour Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:47   Locale support is now on by default Peter Eisentraut
• 04:05   Re: Locale support is now on by default Tom Lane
• 04:09   pg_temp.XX.0 Daniel Kalchev
• 04:13   Re: pg_temp.XX.0 Bruce Momjian
• 05:10   Re: maxint reached? Daniel Kalchev
• 05:12   Re: maxint reached? Daniel Kalchev
• 05:19   Re: SHOW ALL as a query result Dave Page
• 06:03   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Justin Clift
• 06:21   Re: ANALYZE after restore Justin Clift
• 06:40   command.c breakup Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:15   Re: command.c breakup John Gray
• 13:01   Sorting. Re: Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Lincoln Yeoh
• 13:02   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Mikhail Terekhov
• 13:09   Question: update and transaction isolation mlw
• 13:10   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes mlw
• 13:15   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Gavin Sherry
• 13:24   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: maxint reached? Tom Lane
• 13:33   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 13:33   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) mlw
• 13:37   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Andrew Sullivan
• 13:50   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Doug McNaught
• 13:53   Re: command.c breakup Tom Lane
• 14:05   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) mlw
• 14:12   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Doug McNaught
• 14:21   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability mlw
• 14:22   Re: Odd psql \i behaviour Peter Eisentraut
• 14:23   Re: Locale support is now on by default Peter Eisentraut
• 14:25   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) mlw
• 14:35   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: ANALYZE after restore Jan Wieck
• 14:45   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Thomas Lockhart
• 14:50   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Peter Eisentraut
• 14:55   Re: Suggestions please: names for function mlw
• 14:58   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Tom Lane
• 15:08   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Peter Eisentraut
• 15:12   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Peter Eisentraut
• 15:15   Re: ANALYZE after restore Justin Clift
• 15:17   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation mlw
• 15:29   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability mlw
• 15:34   Re: Locale support is now on by default Peter Eisentraut
• 15:35   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Peter Eisentraut
• 15:41   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Tom Lane
• 15:48   Re: Locale support is now on by default Tom Lane
• 15:56   Re: ANALYZE after restore Tom Lane
• 16:01   PSQL completion !? v7.2.1 Hervé Piedvache
• 16:30   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   Re: Suggestions please: names for function mlw
• 17:06   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Mikhail Terekhov
• 17:23   Re: ANALYZE after restore Justin Clift
• 17:25   Re: Locale support is now on by default Bruce Momjian
• 17:25   Re: Locale support is now on by default Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   Re: ANALYZE after restore Tom Lane
• 17:44   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Mikhail Terekhov
• 17:45   Re: ANALYZE after restore Justin Clift
• 18:04   FW: Suggestions please: names for function cachability SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)
• 18:04   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Tom Lane
• 18:17   Question: update and transaction isolation mlw
• 18:20   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) mlw
• 18:21   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Martin Renters
• 20:07   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Peter Eisentraut
• 20:12   Re: Locale support is now on by default Peter Eisentraut
• 20:15   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Tom Lane
• 20:26   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability Thomas Lockhart
• 20:34   Re: Locale support is now on by default Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Re: Locale support is now on by default Peter Eisentraut
• 21:15   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Peter Eisentraut
• 21:58   Re: Locale support is now on by default Bruce Momjian
• 23:08   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:25   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:38   Re: Question: update and transaction isolation Christopher Kings-Lynne

4 April 2002

• 00:22   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 00:47   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:40   What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:05   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:09   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: Locale support is now on by default Peter Eisentraut
• 02:20   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:30   Re: Locale support is now on by default Tom Lane
• 02:46   Re: Locale support is now on by default Bruce Momjian
• 02:48   Changing column types... Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:53   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Joe Conway
• 02:53   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:14   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Peter Eisentraut
• 04:25   Re: Contrib update Bruce Momjian
• 04:37   Re: Always the same ecpg bug - please (re)apply patch Bruce Momjian
• 04:55   Re: Linux/mips compile: [Fwd: Bug#139003: a little bit more Bruce Momjian
• 08:42   Re: Contrib update Vince Vielhaber
• 10:18   Bidirectional hard joins (fwd) Oleg Bartunov
• 12:24   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 12:29   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Tom Lane
• 12:31   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes mlw
• 12:39   Re: ANALYZE after restore Hannu Krosing
• 13:16   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 13:16   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 13:33   Re: Bidirectional hard joins (fwd) Hannu Krosing
• 13:35   Re: Changing column types... Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: Bidirectional hard joins (fwd) Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: ANALYZE after restore Scott Marlowe
• 17:02   Re: Problem compiling PostgreSQL 7.2 on IRIX 6.5.15f lamigo@atc.unican.es
• 17:14   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 18:22   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 18:29   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 18:38   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 18:45   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 19:10   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 19:18   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 19:49   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 20:33   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 20:35   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:47   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:47   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: Changing column types... Thomas Lockhart

5 April 2002

• 00:02   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:13   Sketch for nonunique searches in syscaches Tom Lane
• 00:21   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 00:30   Re: Datatype time PostGreSql 7.2.1 Thomas Lockhart
• 00:46   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:07   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:08   Re: Changing column types... Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:10   Re: Changing column types... Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:23   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:40   Re: Changing column types... Thomas Lockhart
• 02:54   Re: Changing column types... Gavin Sherry
• 04:26   PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:39   Re: Linux/mips compile: [Fwd: Bug#139003: a little bit more Bruce Momjian
• 09:40   Re: Always the same ecpg bug - please (re)apply patch Bruce Momjian
• 13:08   Re: Changing column types... Tom Lane
• 13:11   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 13:13   Re: Changing column types... Tom Lane
• 13:19   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 13:31   [Fwd: AW: UB-Tree's and patents] Justin Clift
• 14:11   Re: [Fwd: AW: UB-Tree's and patents] Oleg Bartunov
• 14:17   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Joe Conway
• 14:22   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 14:53   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 14:55   Re: [Fwd: AW: UB-Tree's and patents] Justin Clift
• 15:01   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 15:23   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Joe Conway
• 15:42   Re: timeout implementation issues Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:08   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Joe Conway
• 16:43   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 17:02   Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 17:13   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 17:14   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 17:30   Re: Suggestion for optimization Doug McNaught
• 17:37   Re: Suggestion for optimization Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 17:46   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 17:51   Re: Suggestion for optimization Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Suggestion for optimization Doug McNaught
• 17:55   Re: Suggestion for optimization Doug McNaught
• 18:03   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 18:22   Re: Suggestion for optimization Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: Suggestion for optimization Rod Taylor
• 18:46   Re: Suggestion for optimization Mike Mascari
• 18:49   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 19:00   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 19:02   Re: Suggestion for optimization Peter Bierman
• 19:05   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 19:10   Re: Suggestion for optimization Jeff Davis
• 19:53   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Joe Conway
• 20:10   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 20:25   Re: Suggestion for optimization Jon Grov
• 20:51   Debugging symbols by default Peter Eisentraut
• 20:57   Re: Debugging symbols by default Larry Rosenman
• 20:57   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 20:58   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Joe Conway
• 21:10   Re: Debugging symbols by default Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   Re: Suggestion for optimization Jeff Davis
• 21:25   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 21:41   Re: Suggestion for optimization Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: Suggestion for optimization Dann Corbit
• 22:11   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 22:46   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:33   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:33   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian

6 April 2002

• 00:43   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Peter Eisentraut
• 01:50   Re: Suggestion for optimization Ken Hirsch
• 03:27   Re: Suggestion for optimization Barry Lind
• 05:28   RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 07:14   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:17   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:42   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:44   Re: Suggestion for optimization Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:36   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 20:17   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 20:30   Re: timeout implementation issues Jessica Perry Hekman
• 20:45   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Peter Eisentraut
• 21:16   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 23:59   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian

7 April 2002

• 00:16   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 00:19   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 00:20   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 00:23   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:40   Re: timeout implementation issues Barry Lind
• 03:04   Re: timeout implementation issues Peter Eisentraut
• 03:32   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 03:39   Re: Debugging symbols by default Peter Eisentraut
• 03:56   Re: timeout implementation issues Peter Eisentraut
• 04:14   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 06:58   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:58   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:09   Indexing and regular expressions Kjartan Ásþórsson
• 09:54   Re: Indexing and regular expressions Oleg Bartunov
• 10:44   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:48   Re: Indexing and regular expressions Kjartan Бsюуrsson
• 11:25   Re: Suggestion for optimization Gavin Sherry
• 11:59   Re: Suggestion for optimization mlw
• 15:38   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Joe Conway
• 16:11   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: Indexing and regular expressions Neil Conway
• 22:28   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 22:34   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 22:38   Re: Debugging symbols by default Bruce Momjian
• 22:52   Question on ident authorization Kenny H Klatt
• 22:55   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:11   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:26   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:32   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue

8 April 2002

• 00:08   Re: Question on ident authorization Peter Eisentraut
• 01:05   Re: Suggestion for optimization Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:17   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:18   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:23   Re: Suggestion for optimization Bruce Momjian
• 02:33   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 02:53   Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:09   Re: timeout implementation issues Thomas Swan
• 07:27   Re: timeout implementation issues Karel Zak
• 07:29   Re: timeout implementation issues Karel Zak
• 07:44   Re: timeout implementation issues Karel Zak
• 09:23   best method for select within all dimensions of an array Jaume Teixi
• 10:45   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:07   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 12:11   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 13:09   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 13:50   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 14:10   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 14:34   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 14:35   Re: timeout implementation issues Thomas Lockhart
• 14:51   Re: Debugging symbols by default Peter Eisentraut
• 15:18   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 15:22   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 15:55   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 16:02   Re: timeout implementation issues Jan Wieck
• 16:07   Re: timeout implementation issues Peter Eisentraut
• 16:09   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 16:12   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 16:39   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 16:41   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 16:46   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Tom Lane
• 16:57   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 16:58   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 17:12   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 20:15   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 20:17   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 22:37   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:36   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:38   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 23:43   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:46   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian

9 April 2002

• 00:06   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:10   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 00:57   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:59   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:56   Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME bug? Bruce Momjian
• 03:17   Re: Solaris ISM Testing Bruce Momjian
• 03:21   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bruce Momjian
• 03:22   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Tom Lane
• 03:26   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bruce Momjian
• 03:28   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bruce Momjian
• 05:23   Re: [GENERAL] now() AT TIME ZONE 'GMT'; Thomas Lockhart
• 06:55   Re: timeout implementation issues Karel Zak
• 07:20   Re: timeout implementation issues Karel Zak
• 07:48   Re: timeout implementation issues Michael Loftis
• 12:21   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 16:09   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Mikhail Terekhov
• 17:02   Re: timeout implementation issues Peter Eisentraut
• 17:17   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bruce Momjian
• 17:21   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 18:25   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Mattew T. O'Connor
• 18:43   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bradley McLean
• 22:32   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:43   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:51   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:06   Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade. Bruce Momjian
• 23:14   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:24   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:27   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 23:46   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:51   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian

10 April 2002

• 00:16   Re: notification: pg_notify ? Gavin Sherry
• 01:46   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:02   BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:21   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Gavin Sherry
• 02:38   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:48   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:50   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 02:57   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Gavin Sherry
• 03:15   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:31   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 03:36   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 05:09   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:22   Re: timeout implementation issues Thomas Lockhart
• 08:41   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:38   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:30   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Fernando Nasser
• 13:11   A "New Release" list of places to contact about new releases of PostgreSQL Justin Clift
• 13:15   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 13:19   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 13:36   [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Justin Clift
• 14:09   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Hannu Krosing
• 15:58   Re: [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Justin Clift
• 16:00   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 16:04   Re: A "New Release" list of places to contact about new releases Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 16:21   setuid functions Andreas Scherbaum
• 16:50   Re: [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Michael Loftis
• 19:38   Re: [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Hannu Krosing
• 22:56   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:09   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:14   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian

11 April 2002

• 00:29   help with bison Neil Conway
• 00:39   Odd error during vacuum Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:43   Re: Odd error during vacuum Gavin Sherry
• 00:55   Re: help with bison Tom Lane
• 00:57   Re: Odd error during vacuum Tom Lane
• 01:14   Re: help with bison Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:20   Re: help with bison Bear Giles
• 01:42   Re: help with bison Gavin Sherry
• 01:54   Re: help with bison Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:00   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:03   Re: help with bison Neil Conway
• 02:09   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Tom Lane
• 02:22   Re: help with bison Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:24   Re: help with bison Tom Lane
• 02:52   Re: help with bison Bear Giles
• 03:00   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:15   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:16   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 03:19   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:33   Re: help with bison Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 03:36   UNSUSCRIBE pgsql_hackers Jayaraj Oorath
• 03:44   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:50   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 03:52   7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 03:58   Re: timeout implementation issues Peter Eisentraut
• 04:00   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:01   Re: help with bison Gavin Sherry
• 04:04   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 04:07   Re: 7.3 schedule Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:17   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Barry Lind
• 04:17   Re: 7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: help with bison Barry Lind
• 04:40   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Barry Lind
• 05:12   Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:26   Re: 7.3 schedule Ashley Cambrell
• 05:36   Re: 7.3 schedule Nicolas Bazin
• 07:56   Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 08:11   Make text output more generic Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 09:55   Re: 7.3 schedule bpalmer
• 11:11   Re: command.c breakup John Gray
• 13:35   Re: command.c breakup Tom Lane
• 13:38   Deadlock situation using foreign keys (reproduceable) Mario Weilguni
• 13:45   Re: Make text output more generic Tom Lane
• 14:34   Re: Make text output more generic Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:41   Re: Make text output more generic Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: help with bison Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: 7.3 schedule Peter Eisentraut
• 14:54   Re: 7.3 schedule Neil Conway
• 14:58   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 15:00   Re: 7.3 schedule Marc G. Fournier
• 15:02   Re: help with bison Neil Conway
• 15:03   Re: Deadlock situation using foreign keys (reproduceable) Stephan Szabo
• 15:14   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Thomas Lockhart
• 15:16   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: help with bison Neil Conway
• 15:23   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 15:30   Re: help with bison Gavin Sherry
• 15:30   Re: help with bison Joe Conway
• 15:34   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 15:48   Re: 7.3 schedule Hannu Krosing
• 16:24   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 16:56   Re: help with bison Peter Eisentraut
• 17:39   Re: 7.3 schedule Barry Lind
• 18:24   Re: [pgadmin-support] migration problem Dave Page
• 19:23   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: 7.3 schedule Barry Lind
• 20:27   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 20:57   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Peter Eisentraut
• 21:13   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: command.c breakup John Gray
• 22:36   Re: 7.3 schedule Ashley Cambrell
• 22:55   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:33   Informix to PostgreSQL (JDBC) Nicolas Bazin
• 23:51   Re: 7.3 schedule Neil Conway

12 April 2002

• 00:06   Re: 7.3 schedule Brian Bruns
• 01:26   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 01:33   Re: command.c breakup Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:55   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 02:57   Re: 7.3 schedule Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:08   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:42   Re: 7.3 schedule Neil Conway
• 04:29   Re: help with bison Thomas Lockhart
• 06:26   Various issues Jean-Michel POURE
• 06:53   Re: 7.3 schedule Karel Zak
• 06:55   Re: Various issues Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:06   Re: Various issues Andrea Aime
• 07:31   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Dave Page
• 07:50   Re: 7.3 schedule Hannu Krosing
• 07:51   Re: command.c breakup John Gray
• 08:00   Re: Bidirectional hard joins (fwd) Curt Sampson
• 08:12   Disregard my last message Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:50   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Jan Wieck
• 12:52   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:14   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 13:34   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:55   Re: 7.3 schedule Barry Lind
• 15:20   Re: help with bison Joe Conway
• 15:21   Re: 7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: 7.3 schedule Barry Lind
• 15:42   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 15:49   Re: 7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 16:28   pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Tom Lane
• 17:12   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Jan Wieck
• 19:25   Re: 7.3 schedule Neil Conway
• 20:26   Re: 7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 20:36   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: 7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 20:56   Re: 7.3 schedule Dann Corbit
• 21:19   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Jan Wieck
• 21:24   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 21:25   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 21:33   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 21:51   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Jan Wieck
• 21:59   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Tom Lane
• 22:24   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Neil Conway
• 23:13   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 23:14   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian

13 April 2002

• 00:29   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Neil Conway
• 00:38   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 00:39   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Bruce Momjian
• 02:35   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Tom Lane
• 02:39   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Bruce Momjian
• 05:04   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Peter Eisentraut
• 05:06   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Tom Lane
• 05:12   Scanner performance (was Re: 7.3 schedule) Peter Eisentraut
• 05:22   Re: Scanner performance (was Re: 7.3 schedule) Tom Lane
• 05:25   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:29   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Peter Eisentraut
• 05:29   Re: 7.3 schedule Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:39   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 11:32   Re: 7.3 schedule Hannu Krosing
• 13:35   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: DROP COLUMN (was RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate) Tom Lane
• 14:34   Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: 7.3 schedule Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: DROP COLUMN (was RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate) Hannu Krosing
• 15:20   Re: DROP COLUMN (was RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate) Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: numeric/decimal docs bug? Jan Wieck
• 17:35   Re: 7.3 schedule Neil Conway
• 18:57   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Bruce Momjian
• 21:48   experimental pg_qcache patch Neil Conway

14 April 2002

• 00:11   JDBC build fails Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:23   Re: JDBC build fails Bruce Momjian
• 02:59   PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for RedHat-skipjack 7.2.93 and RedHat 6.2/SPARC Lamar Owen
• 03:16   cost of parse/plan/execute for one sample query Barry Lind
• 03:19   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:19   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:36   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Neil Conway
• 03:55   Re: [PATCHES] [patch] fe-connect.c doesn't handle EINTR correctly Bruce Momjian
• 04:03   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian
• 04:06   Re: DROP COLUMN (was RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate) Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:12   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:21   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Bruce Momjian
• 04:27   bug with current sources? Re: cost of parse/plan/execute for one sample query Barry Lind
• 13:26   Re: [GENERAL] Performance Tuning Document? Matthew Kirkwood
• 13:38   Re: Again, sorry, caching. Bruce Momjian
• 15:55   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: Again, sorry, caching. Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: bug with current sources? Re: cost of parse/plan/execute for one sample query Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: Again, sorry, caching. Bruce Momjian
• 16:16   Re: Again, sorry, caching. Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: Again, sorry, caching. Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   Re: [BUGS] Bug #633: CASE statement evaluation does not short-circut Tom Lane
• 16:32   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Gavin Sherry
• 16:42   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Peter Eisentraut
• 17:14   Re: DROP COLUMN (was RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate) Tom Lane
• 17:48   Redhat 7.2.93 performance (was:Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for RedHat-skipjack 7.2.93 and RedHat 6.2/SPARC) Lamar Owen
• 18:00   Re: Redhat 7.2.93 performance (was:Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for RedHat-skipjack 7.2.93 and RedHat 6.2/SPARC) Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
• 18:03   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian
• 18:22   Re: 7.3 schedule Karel Zak
• 18:27   Re: Redhat 7.2.93 performance (was:Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for RedHat-skipjack 7.2.93 and RedHat 6.2/SPARC) Lamar Owen
• 18:59   Re: Redhat 7.2.93 performance (was:Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for RedHat-skipjack 7.2.93 and RedHat 6.2/SPARC) Michael Loftis
• 19:00   Re: Redhat 7.2.93 performance (was:Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for RedHat-skipjack 7.2.93 and RedHat 6.2/SPARC) Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
• 19:13   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Karel Zak
• 19:30   Re: command.c breakup Rod Taylor
• 19:39   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Karel Zak
• 19:47   Re: command.c breakup John Gray
• 19:59   Re: command.c breakup Rod Taylor
• 20:41   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Neil Conway
• 22:12   Re: command.c breakup John Gray
• 23:25   Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument? Bruce Momjian
• 23:39   Re: 7.3 schedule Brian Bruns
• 23:56   status report Bruce Momjian

15 April 2002

• 00:26   Security Issue.. Rod Taylor
• 00:34   Re: Security Issue.. Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Re: Security Issue.. Peter Eisentraut
• 00:42   Re: Security Issue.. Rod Taylor
• 01:00   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Gavin Sherry
• 01:08   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian
• 01:13   Re: Security Issue.. Rod Taylor
• 01:16   ecpg/preproc/preproc.y now generates lots of warnings Tom Lane
• 01:29   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:34   Re: Security Issue.. Tom Lane
• 01:35   That CREATE OPERATOR CLASS patch Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:36   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 01:38   Re: Security Issue.. Bruce Momjian
• 01:53   Re: Security Issue.. Rod Taylor
• 01:53   Re: That CREATE OPERATOR CLASS patch Bruce Momjian
• 02:47   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:01   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Rod Taylor
• 03:16   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian
• 03:17   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian
• 03:18   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Peter Eisentraut
• 03:41   Re: 7.3 schedule Curt Sampson
• 03:45   Re: bug with current sources? Re: cost of parse/plan/execute Barry Lind
• 03:45   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian
• 03:47   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Peter Eisentraut
• 03:49   Re: bug with current sources? Re: cost of parse/plan/execute for one sample query Tom Lane
• 03:55   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Tom Lane
• 03:55   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Tom Lane
• 03:56   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Tom Lane
• 03:56   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Tom Lane
• 03:57   Re: 7.3 schedule Barry Lind
• 03:57   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Rod Taylor
• 04:01   Re: Security Issue.. Peter Eisentraut
• 04:01   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Peter Eisentraut
• 04:45   Re: 7.3 schedule Curt Sampson
• 05:07   Re: bug with current sources? Re: cost of parse/plan/execute for one sample query Tom Lane
• 05:08   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:36   more on large oids Daniel Kalchev
• 05:48   Importing Large Amounts of Data Curt Sampson
• 06:05   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:41   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Curt Sampson
• 06:51   Re: [PATCHES] unknownin/out patch (was PQescapeBytea is Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:53   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:19   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Curt Sampson
• 07:24   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:53   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Denis Perchine
• 08:15   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:21   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Denis Perchine
• 08:24   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 08:42   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Vince Vielhaber
• 09:12   deletion of attributes Michael Meskes
• 10:06   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 12:41   Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1-2PGDG RPMs available for Hannu Krosing
• 12:48   Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] postgresql@fruru.com
• 13:04   Re: more on large oids Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Tycho Fruru
• 13:11   Re: pg_dump is broken in CVS tip Neil Conway
• 13:20   Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] Jean-Luc Lachance
• 13:30   Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] postgresql@fruru.com
• 13:43   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Tom Lane
• 13:59   Stumbled upon a time bug... Rod Taylor
• 14:44   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 15:20   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: That CREATE OPERATOR CLASS patch Bill Studenmund
• 15:40   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Peter Eisentraut
• 15:56   Operators and schemas Tom Lane
• 16:58   Array Iterator functions Rod Taylor
• 17:26   Re: rules and default values Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: Operators and schemas Fernando Nasser
• 17:40   Re: Operators and schemas Tom Lane
• 17:43   Re: rules and default values Neil Conway
• 18:08   regression in CVS HEAD Neil Conway
• 18:13   RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 18:20   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 18:24   Re: Array Iterator functions Tom Lane
• 18:31   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: Operators and schemas Peter Eisentraut
• 18:51   Re: Operators and schemas Rod Taylor
• 19:00   Re: regression in CVS HEAD Tom Lane
• 19:02   Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian
• 19:31   Re: Operators and schemas Tom Lane
• 19:51   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Peter Eisentraut
• 19:57   Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks Tom Lane
• 20:12   Re: Operators and schemas Peter Eisentraut
• 20:55   Re: Operators and schemas Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: regression in CVS HEAD Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: [PATCHES] [patch] fe-connect.c doesn't handle EINTR correctly Bruce Momjian
• 22:36   Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument? Bruce Momjian
• 23:54   Re: Operators and schemas Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:58   Re: Operators and schemas Tom Lane

16 April 2002

• 00:11   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:11   Re: JDBC build fails Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:13   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 00:21   multibyte support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:32   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Curt Sampson
• 00:44   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Bruce Momjian
• 00:47   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Peter Eisentraut
• 00:49   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Neil Conway
• 00:53   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Curt Sampson
• 00:57   Re: Operators and schemas Peter Eisentraut
• 01:02   Re: multibyte support by default Peter Eisentraut
• 01:33   Re: Bug #633: CASE statement evaluation does not short-circut Thomas Lockhart
• 01:33   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Manuel Sugawara
• 01:44   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:46   Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts Thomas Lockhart
• 01:57   Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:59   Re: Stumbled upon a time bug... Thomas Lockhart
• 02:18   Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit Bruce Momjian
• 02:19   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Rod Taylor
• 02:24   Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch Rod Taylor
• 02:34   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Alvaro Herrera
• 02:42   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Neil Conway
• 02:44   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Bruce Momjian
• 02:49   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:56   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Gavin Sherry
• 03:12   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Manuel Sugawara
• 03:21   Re: Operators and schemas Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Peter Eisentraut
• 03:34   Re: multibyte support by default Tom Lane
• 03:35   Firebird 1.0 released Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:02   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Tom Lane
• 04:05   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Curt Sampson
• 04:07   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Bruce Momjian
• 04:11   Re: Firebird 1.0 released Tom Lane
• 04:15   Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data Gavin Sherry
• 04:15   Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch Bruce Momjian
• 06:06   Re: ecpg/preproc/preproc.y now generates lots of warnings Michael Meskes
• 06:17   Places to update when a new version is out Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:26   Re: Places to update when a new version is out Justin Clift
• 06:35   Re: Places to update when a new version is out Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:25   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 09:43   Re: multibyte support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:08   Re: Firebird 1.0 released Denis Perchine
• 10:43   Improved vacuumlo Mario Weilguni
• 10:56   Re: Improved vacuumlo Mario Weilguni
• 11:14   Is this a better MVCC. mlw
• 11:41   Testers needed ... Marc G. Fournier
• 11:42   PL/JAVA Laszlo Hornyak
• 12:09   Re: multibyte support by default Tom Lane
• 12:15   Re: Is this a better MVCC. Tom Lane
• 12:24   Re: Testers needed ... Gavin Sherry
• 12:47   Re: Firebird 1.0 released Tom Lane
• 13:03   Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Louis-David Mitterrand
• 13:24   Re: [GENERAL] Testers needed ... Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: [GENERAL] Testers needed ... Marc G. Fournier
• 13:42   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 13:42   date_in function Dragos Manzateanu
• 13:48   Re: Is this a better MVCC. Lincoln Yeoh
• 14:51   Re: experimental pg_qcache patch Bruce Momjian
• 15:11   Foreign Key woes -- 7.2 and ~7.3 Rod Taylor
• 16:07   Re: Places to update when a new version is out Bruce Momjian
• 16:18   Re: Foreign Key woes -- 7.2 and ~7.3 Stephan Szabo
• 16:19   Re: Scanner performance (was Re: 7.3 schedule) Peter Eisentraut
• 16:57   Re: Scanner performance (was Re: 7.3 schedule) Bruce Momjian
• 17:08   Re: [GENERAL] Testers needed ... Jan Wieck
• 17:12   Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit Hannu Krosing
• 17:18   Re: multibyte support by default Hannu Krosing
• 17:25   Just a Question Bosco Ng
• 17:25   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Louis-David Mitterrand
• 17:27   Re: Operators and schemas Fernando Nasser
• 17:38   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 17:51   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 18:26   Re: date_in function Dragos Manzateanu
• 20:27   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian
• 21:25   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 21:28   Re: Operators and schemas Peter Eisentraut
• 21:34   Re: Operators and schemas Dann Corbit
• 21:58   Re: Operators and schemas Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: Operators and schemas Dann Corbit
• 22:14   Re: Firebird 1.0 released Richard Tucker
• 22:19   Re: [BUGS] Foreign Key woes -- 7.2 and ~7.3 Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 22:35   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian
• 22:54   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Gavin Sherry
• 22:55   Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian
• 23:04   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Alvaro Herrera
• 23:19   Re: Testers needed ... Alvaro Herrera
• 23:23   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 23:31   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 23:47   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Stephan Szabo

17 April 2002

• 01:11   Re: multibyte support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:29   Re: [BUGS] Foreign Key woes -- 7.2 and ~7.3 Rod Taylor
• 02:53   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 02:58   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: Standards URL's Bruce Momjian
• 04:05   Re: Scanner performance (was Re: 7.3 schedule) Tom Lane
• 04:06   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 04:16   Re: Where to get official SQL spec (was Re: Domain Support) Bruce Momjian
• 04:28   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 04:40   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:43   Re: date_in function Dragos Manzateanu
• 04:52   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 05:02   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 05:07   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Oliver Elphick
• 05:07   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Oliver Elphick
• 05:17   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 05:53   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:25   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 07:36   date_in function Dragos Manzateanu
• 08:09   plpq Darko Prenosil
• 08:17   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 08:45   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 09:15   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 09:55   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE tycho@fruru.com
• 11:50   problem with anoncvs? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 11:51   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Hannu Krosing
• 12:10   Re: problem with anoncvs? Marc G. Fournier
• 12:27   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Thomas Lockhart
• 12:52   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 12:52   huge runtime difference between 2 almost identical queries (was: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE) Louis-David Mitterrand
• 12:56   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 13:08   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 13:11   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 13:14   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 13:24   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 13:32   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 13:34   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 13:38   Re: huge runtime difference between 2 almost identical queries (was: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE) Tom Lane
• 13:39   Re: problem with anoncvs? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:42   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Thomas Lockhart
• 13:48   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Lincoln Yeoh
• 13:52   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 13:58   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 14:01   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 14:04   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:09   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Thomas Lockhart
• 14:11   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 14:16   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: date_in function Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 14:26   Re: huge runtime difference between 2 almost identical queries (was: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE) Louis-David Mitterrand
• 14:32   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Mike Mascari
• 14:46   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 15:14   Re: huge runtime difference between 2 almost identical queries (was: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE) Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Hannu Krosing
• 15:27   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Hannu Krosing
• 15:36   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 16:43   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 16:51   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 17:09   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Andrew Sullivan
• 17:28   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Peter Eisentraut
• 17:42   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 17:52   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 18:04   Bison grammer Michael Meskes
• 18:07   Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in Bruce Momjian
• 18:15   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Rod Taylor
• 19:29   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 19:55   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Andrew Sullivan
• 19:56   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 20:11   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 20:13   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 20:17   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 20:17   updated qCache Neil Conway
• 20:30   Re: updated qCache Dann Corbit
• 20:39   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 20:42   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 20:45   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 20:54   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Doug McNaught
• 20:56   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 20:57   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:57   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:57   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 20:58   Re: [SQL] A bug in gistPageAddItem()/gist_tuple_replacekey() ??? Bruce Momjian
• 21:00   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Dann Corbit
• 21:03   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 21:04   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 21:06   Re: updated qCache Neil Conway
• 21:06   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 21:08   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Hannu Krosing
• 21:17   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Manuel Sugawara
• 21:21   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bill Cunningham
• 22:41   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 22:47   Re: Patch for xlog.c Bruce Momjian
• 23:54   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Sean Chittenden
• 23:57   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Tatsuo Ishii

18 April 2002

• 00:01   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 00:41   Re: compile bug in HEAD? Bruce Momjian
• 00:49   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Mark Pritchard
• 01:06   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 01:12   Re: PyGreSQL bug Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Justin Clift
• 01:38   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 01:43   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Justin Clift
• 01:58   Re: SHOW ALL as a query result Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Bruce Momjian
• 02:15   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:18   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Bruce Momjian
• 02:19   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:21   Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch Rod Taylor
• 02:24   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Bruce Momjian
• 02:25   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Bruce Momjian
• 02:49   Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Manuel Sugawara
• 02:58   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 03:00   Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate Bruce Momjian
• 03:02   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 03:06   Re: updated qCache Tom Lane
• 03:13   Re: 7.3 schedule Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   Re: updated qCache Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:16   Re: updated qCache Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:03   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Bruce Momjian
• 04:24   Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch Tom Lane
• 04:32   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 05:40   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Justin Clift
• 06:11   Is this an IN bug? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:11   Oops! Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:13   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 07:03   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Andreas Scherbaum
• 07:08   Re: [SQL] A bug in gistPageAddItem()/gist_tuple_replacekey() ??? (fwd) Teodor Sigaev
• 07:14   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Maarten.Boekhold@reuters.com
• 07:34   Re: updated qCache Karel Zak
• 07:41   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE tycho@fruru.com
• 07:55   Re: updated qCache Karel Zak
• 07:56   Re: timeout implementation issues Michael Loftis
• 08:04   Re: updated qCache Karel Zak
• 08:42   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:33   Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch Rod Taylor
• 10:34   another optimizer question Jakub Ouhrabka
• 11:07   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Justin Clift
• 11:21   SQL Query Optimization Dav Coleman
• 11:21   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Mark Pritchard
• 11:22   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 11:22   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 11:22   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 11:26   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• 11:30   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 11:56   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Andreas Scherbaum
• 12:23   Bug or misunderstanding w/domains in 7.3devel? Joel Burton
• 12:35   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 12:39   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 13:21   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: another optimizer question Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 13:34   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 13:35   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 13:38   Re: SQL Query Optimization Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 13:50   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 13:53   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 14:02   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Alexandre Dulaunoy
• 14:13   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Doug McNaught
• 14:16   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Thomas Lockhart
• 14:17   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: timeout implementation issues Bruce Momjian
• 14:23   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Bruce Momjian
• 14:36   Re: [SQL] A bug in gistPageAddItem()/gist_tuple_replacekey() Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Alexandre Dulaunoy
• 14:53   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Bruce Momjian
• 15:02   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Tom Lane
• 15:05   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Alvaro Herrera
• 15:07   Re: [SQL] SQL Query Optimization Dav Coleman
• 15:11   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 15:12   Re: regexp character class locale awareness patch Manuel Sugawara
• 15:23   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Alexandre Dulaunoy
• 15:24   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 15:24   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Christopher Browne
• 15:24   Re: [SQL] SQL Query Optimization Tom Lane
• 15:34   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Thomas Lockhart
• 15:43   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Andreas Scherbaum
• 16:01   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Tom Lane
• 19:20   Names of view select rules Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Mark Pritchard
• 21:30   Re: Names of view select rules Jan Wieck
• 22:14   Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Rod Taylor
• 22:48   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:55   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Peter Eisentraut
• 22:57   Re: timeout implementation issues Tom Lane
• 23:01   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Joe Conway
• 23:10   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 23:18   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:19   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 23:25   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Oliver Elphick
• 23:27   Re: timeout implementation issues Michael Loftis
• 23:30   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Oliver Elphick
• 23:38   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Rod Taylor

19 April 2002

• 00:19   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 00:24   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Joe Conway
• 00:49   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Oliver Elphick
• 01:02   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Rod Taylor
• 01:02   Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Tom Lane
• 01:06   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:08   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 01:15   Getting Constrint information..?? Steffen Nielsen
• 01:22   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Rod Taylor
• 01:24   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Rod Taylor
• 01:35   syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:39   Re: Getting Constrint information..?? Tom Lane
• 01:53   Re: syslog support by default Tom Lane
• 01:56   Re: syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:06   Re: timeout implementation issues Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:10   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Stephan Szabo
• 02:23   Re: syslog support by default Peter Eisentraut
• 02:30   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Tom Lane
• 02:43   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Stephan Szabo
• 03:49   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Joe Conway
• 04:00   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Alvaro Herrera
• 04:04   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:08   Re: syslog support by default Hannu Krosing
• 05:17   Re: syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:20   Re: syslog support by default Mario Weilguni
• 05:21   Re: syslog support by default Hannu Krosing
• 05:41   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 05:58   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 06:05   Re: syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:14   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Curt Sampson
• 07:13   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Andreas Scherbaum
• 08:03   Large object security Damon Cokenias
• 08:27   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Maarten.Boekhold@reuters.com
• 09:11   Re: Large object security Mario Weilguni
• 11:58   My talk at Linuxtag Michael Meskes
• 12:49   Re: syslog support by default Tom Lane
• 12:59   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Tom Lane
• 13:03   Re: Large object security Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Sander Steffann
• 13:13   Re: Large object security Damon Cokenias
• 15:57   Improved scanner performance Peter Eisentraut
• 15:57   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: Large object security Barry Lind
• 16:25   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Joe Conway
• 16:35   Re: Improved scanner performance Tom Lane
• 17:01   Really annoying comments... Rod Taylor
• 17:43   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Really annoying comments... Tom Lane
• 18:15   commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup John Gray
• 18:34   Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup Tom Lane
• 18:38   Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup Fernando Nasser
• 19:29   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Joe Conway
• 19:36   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Tom Lane

20 April 2002

• 02:19   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Curt Sampson
• 02:59   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Lincoln Yeoh
• 03:07   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Tom Lane
• 03:21   Re: Improved scanner performance Peter Eisentraut
• 04:04   Re: Improved scanner performance Tom Lane
• 07:07   On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson
• 07:22   Re: On-Disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson
• 08:04   Re: On-Disk Tuple Size Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:17   Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup John Gray
• 09:19   Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup John Gray
• 13:22   Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:28   Re: On-Disk Tuple Size Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: Documentation on page files Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: Improved scanner performance Peter Eisentraut
• 16:25   Re: Improved scanner performance Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: [GENERAL] general design question Curt Sampson
• 23:11   Implement a .NET Data Provider Francisco Jr.
• 23:23   Re: syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:35   Re: syslog support by default Tom Lane

21 April 2002

• 01:05   Re: Improved scanner performance Tom Lane
• 01:07   Foreign keys and indexes. Rod Taylor
• 01:16   Re: Foreign keys and indexes. Rod Taylor
• 03:05   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Sander Steffann
• 03:06   Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang ."@babolo.ru
• 03:48   Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang Peter Eisentraut
• 03:59   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Curt Sampson
• 05:35   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson
• 05:46   Re: Documentation on page files Curt Sampson
• 06:46   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson
• 08:47   Re: Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:28   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Rod Taylor
• 13:39   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Tom Lane
• 16:19   failed regression tests Thomas Lockhart
• 16:40   Re: failed regression tests Peter Eisentraut
• 16:57   Re: failed regression tests Thomas Lockhart
• 17:26   Re: Foreign keys and indexes. Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: Really annoying comments... Dave Page
• 17:45   Re: Really annoying comments... Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: Really annoying comments... Dave Page
• 18:03   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Curt Sampson
• 18:10   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson
• 19:02   Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 19:10   Re: Really annoying comments... Rod Taylor
• 19:27   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 19:30   Coster/planner and edge cases... Michael Loftis
• 19:41   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 19:57   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 19:59   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 20:02   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 20:10   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway
• 20:22   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 20:25   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 20:25   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 20:37   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway
• 20:47   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 20:50   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway
• 20:52   GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane
• 20:53   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 21:01   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart
• 21:01   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Peter Eisentraut
• 21:06   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 21:07   Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart
• 21:35   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway
• 21:36   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 21:48   Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Michael Loftis
• 21:52   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Michael Loftis
• 22:06   Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart
• 22:36   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart
• 22:54   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Peter Eisentraut
• 22:57   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart

22 April 2002

• 00:28   Re: failed regression tests Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:01   How to know whether a table is locked ? Nicolas Bazin
• 01:11   Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:57   Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart
• 02:09   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Peter Eisentraut
• 02:25   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane
• 03:55   few probs with integer timestamps Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:54   Re: few probs with integer timestamps Thomas Lockhart
• 09:09   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 11:31   Re: Implement a .NET Data Provider Jean-Michel POURE
• 11:32   Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Sander Steffann
• 11:32   Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang ."@babolo.ru
• 11:33   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 14:19   Fixups on variable.c Thomas Lockhart
• 15:14   Re: Documentation on page files Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:16   [RFC] Set Returning Functions Joe Conway
• 16:57   Re: Documentation on page files Patrick Macdonald
• 19:23   Simplifying OID lookups in the presence of namespaces Tom Lane
• 20:16   What is wrong with hashed index usage? Dann Corbit
• 20:35   Re: Implement a .NET Data Francisco Jr.
• 20:59   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Neil Conway
• 21:05   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Dann Corbit
• 21:13   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Neil Conway
• 21:46   ecpg/preproc.y is generating reduce/reduce conflicts Tom Lane
• 22:25   NAMEDATALEN revisited Rod Taylor
• 22:29   Re: Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:48   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Michael Loftis

23 April 2002

• 02:35   Re: Simplifying OID lookups in the presence of namespaces Joe Conway
• 02:46   Re: Simplifying OID lookups in the presence of namespaces Tom Lane
• 03:33   I am back Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   "make report" Thomas Lockhart
• 04:39   Re: "make report" cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 05:15   Re: Documentation on page files Hannu Krosing
• 06:26   Re: Implement a .NET Data Dave Page
• 06:52   Re: Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:18   Re: "make report" Curt Sampson
• 07:22   Re: Documentation on page files Curt Sampson
• 07:55   Generating Huge String? Steffen Nielsen
• 12:50   Re: Generating Huge String? Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: "make report" Tom Lane
• 15:27   Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 15:43   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bradley McLean
• 15:46   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 15:56   Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Bruce Momjian
• 15:59   Re: syslog support by default Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 16:10   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 16:29   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   Re: PyGreSQL bug Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: My talk at Linuxtag Bruce Momjian
• 17:15   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Lamar Owen
• 17:27   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Joe Conway
• 19:18   Re: Generating Huge String? Steffen Nielsen
• 19:26   Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Bruce Momjian
• 19:51   Re: Documentation on page files Hannu Krosing
• 19:56   Re: How to know whether a table is locked ? Bruce Momjian
• 22:25   Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut
• 22:46   Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Bruce Momjian
• 22:55   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Bruce Momjian
• 23:19   Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:57   Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Bruce Momjian

24 April 2002

• 00:05   Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Peter Eisentraut
• 00:57   Re: Patch for xlog.c Bruce Momjian
• 00:58   Re: build of 7.2.1 on SCO Openserver and Unixware 7.1.1 Bruce Momjian
• 01:21   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 01:36   namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Rod Taylor
• 01:50   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Neil Conway
• 01:55   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 02:06   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 02:12   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Rod Taylor
• 03:38   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 04:04   timeout implementation issues Nicolas Bazin
• 04:36   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 04:40   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Tom Lane
• 05:19   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:26   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Philip Warner
• 06:01   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Lincoln Yeoh
• 06:51   Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 11:32   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 12:44   Returning text from stored procedures?? Steffen Nielsen
• 12:55   Re: "make report" Thomas Lockhart
• 12:56   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 12:57   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Bruce Momjian
• 13:03   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 13:08   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian
• 13:21   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Tom Lane
• 13:23   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 13:28   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 13:31   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 13:57   Table checking/dumping program Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:31   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: Returning text from stored procedures?? Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 15:53   Parser translations and schemas Tom Lane
• 16:03   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 16:33   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Michael Loftis
• 17:09   Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut
• 17:18   Re: "make report" Igor Kovalenko
• 17:19   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 17:20   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Vince Vielhaber
• 17:22   Re: Parser translations and schemas Peter Eisentraut
• 17:28   Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut
• 20:15   Re: Implement a .NET Data Francisco Jr.
• 21:13   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 21:50   PostgreSQL index usage discussion. mlw
• 22:41   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:05   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:39   Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck

25 April 2002

• 00:04   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:08   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 00:09   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:12   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 00:15   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:17   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 00:27   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:29   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 00:31   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Michael Loftis
• 00:37   Re: PostgreSQL index usage discussion. Bradley McLean
• 00:40   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:40   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 00:47   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 00:47   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:56   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian
• 01:00   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 01:05   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 01:06   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Michael Loftis
• 01:07   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:07   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 01:08   referential integrity problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:09   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Michael Loftis
• 01:19   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:36   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:51   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:53   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:54   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 01:59   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:59   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 02:10   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:19   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 02:30   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Tom Lane
• 02:37   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:04   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian
• 03:12   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 04:21   md5 passwords and pg_shadow Neil Conway
• 04:43   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Michael Loftis
• 04:50   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 04:52   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Michael Loftis
• 05:05   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 05:38   Re: PostgreSQL index usage discussion. Hannu Krosing
• 05:42   Re: PostgreSQL index usage discussion. Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 05:48   Re: PostgreSQL index usage discussion. Hannu Krosing
• 05:56   Re: PostgreSQL index usage discussion. Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 06:28   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 06:55   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 07:21   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Lincoln Yeoh
• 08:19   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 09:47   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 10:42   ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Lee Kindness
• 11:52   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 12:01   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Sander Steffann
• 12:02   Re: ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Michael Meskes
• 12:08   Block size: 8K or 16K? mlw
• 12:15   WAL -> Replication Mike Biamonte
• 12:15   non-standard escapes in string literals pimlott@idiomtech.com (Andrew Pimlott)
• 12:53   Re: Block size: 8K or 16K? mlw
• 12:54   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 13:34   Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Andreas Scherbaum
• 13:37   Re: WAL -> Replication Bruce Momjian
• 13:42   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Bruce Momjian
• 13:56   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian
• 14:01   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: Block size: 8K or 16K? Neil Conway
• 14:34   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Hannu Krosing
• 15:48   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Neil Conway
• 16:19   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Mike Mascari
• 16:31   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals F Harvell
• 16:32   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 16:39   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 17:18   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 17:26   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 17:33   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Neil Conway
• 17:54   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 18:08   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Tom Lane
• 19:19   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Michael Loftis
• 19:22   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: md5 passwords and pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 19:32   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 19:38   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Bruce Momjian
• 20:04   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Vince Vielhaber
• 20:04   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Neil Conway
• 20:15   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Tom Lane
• 20:25   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals F Harvell
• 20:34   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Michael Loftis
• 20:42   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Vince Vielhaber
• 23:45   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Kyle

26 April 2002

• 00:57   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 01:18   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian
• 01:20   8K vs 16K block size report mlw
• 01:20   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 01:22   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 01:25   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 01:31   pg_constraint Rod Taylor
• 01:33   Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Tom Lane
• 01:37   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 01:51   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 02:31   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 02:37   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Lincoln Yeoh
• 03:43   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 04:09   Re: Block size: 8K or 16K? Curt Sampson
• 04:28   Re: Block size: 8K or 16K? Bruce Momjian
• 04:36   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Curt Sampson
• 04:38   Re: WAL -> Replication Curt Sampson
• 06:34   Re: pg_constraint Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:46   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Lee Kindness
• 09:33   Re: WAL -> Replication Hannu Krosing
• 10:50   Re: pg_constraint Rod Taylor
• 11:31   Re: Block size: 8K or 16K? mlw
• 11:36   PSQL \x \l command issues Shad
• 12:17   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 12:23   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 12:24   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 12:34   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 12:38   Re: PSQL \x \l command issues Doug McNaught
• 12:57   Re: syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:00   multibyte support is now enabled by default Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:25   Re: pg_constraint Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: WAL -> Replication Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 13:50   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 13:50   Re: pg_constraint Tom Lane
• 13:59   Re: pg_constraint Rod Taylor
• 14:10   Re: PSQL \x \l command issues Tom Lane
• 14:20   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Lincoln Yeoh
• 14:34   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 14:44   Re: pg_constraint Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 16:29   Re: pg_constraint Rod Taylor
• 17:32   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 19:33   Re: WAL -> Replication Bruce Momjian
• 23:00   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Lincoln Yeoh

27 April 2002

• 00:54   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Philip Warner
• 03:50   Arrays in system tables Rod Taylor
• 04:31   ... Shra
• 05:07   Re: Arrays in system tables Bruce Momjian
• 05:09   Re: Arrays in system tables Rod Taylor
• 12:18   Re: WAL -> Replication Hannu Krosing
• 13:56   Mandrake 8.1 RPMs posted Thomas Lockhart
• 14:07   Re: [BUGS] Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: Mandrake 8.1 RPMs posted Lamar Owen
• 22:28   Vacation in May Bruce Momjian

28 April 2002

• 19:49   a new contrib mlw
• 21:34   new contrib: decode(..) concat(..) mlw

29 April 2002

• 00:24   pg_dump broken in cvs tip Joe Conway
• 02:57   Re: pg_dump broken in cvs tip Tom Lane
• 07:34   MetaData (size of datatype) Shra
• 10:41   Re: MetaData (size of datatype) Shra
• 12:11   Re: MetaData (size of datatype) Hannu Krosing
• 12:14   Re: PSQL \x \l command issues Shad
• 13:14   pg_config Makefile includes hyphens in configure arguments Joel Burton
• 13:23   GSSAPI/Kerberos Phil Dodderidge
• 13:47   Re: MetaData (size of datatype) Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Scott Marlowe
• 14:14   clarification of timestamp Olivier PRENANT
• 14:28   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hannu Krosing
• 14:30   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 14:31   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hannu Krosing
• 14:53   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 14:56   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 14:57   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 15:38   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 15:39   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 15:40   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 15:54   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 15:54   Re: clarification of timestamp Thomas Lockhart
• 15:54   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hannu Krosing
• 16:06   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 16:06   Re: clarification of timestamp Olivier PRENANT
• 16:07   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Hannu Krosing
• 16:07   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Doug McNaught
• 16:41   #warning possibly dangerous? Tom Lane
• 17:12   Folding variable.c into the GUC structure, redux Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 17:17   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 17:24   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 17:40   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck
• 17:42   Re: Vacation in May Neil Conway
• 17:50   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Marc G. Fournier
• 18:43   Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 19:36   Re: Vacation in May Bruce Momjian

30 April 2002

• 00:24   Temp tables are curious creatures.... Rod Taylor
• 00:35   Re: Temp tables are curious creatures.... Tom Lane
• 00:35   Re: Temp tables are curious creatures.... Bruce Momjian
• 00:50   Civility of core/hackers group Bruce Momjian
• 01:36   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:39   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Bruce Momjian
• 01:40   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Rod Taylor
• 01:52   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Rod Taylor
• 01:55   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Bruce Momjian
• 02:06   Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction John Ingram
• 02:11   Re: Civility of core/hackers group mlw
• 02:27   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Lamar Owen
• 02:27   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Gavin Sherry
• 04:11   Re: Civility of core/hackers group Tom Lane
• 04:26   Mac OS X: system shutdown prevents checkpoint Tom Lane
• 05:33   Re: Mac OS X: system shutdown prevents checkpoint Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:59   Re: [RFC] Set Returning Functions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:31   Re: Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks Karel Zak
• 08:37   Re: Temp tables are curious creatures.... Hannu Krosing
• 09:09   Re: Temp tables are curious creatures.... Hannu Krosing
• 11:19   Re: Temp tables are curious creatures.... Rod Taylor
• 11:34   Help!! shibu.kurian@orbitech.co.in
• 11:34   Graphical Aplication for visualising postgresql internals shibu.kurian@orbitech.co.in
• 12:43   Re: Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks Tom Lane
• 13:04   Re: [RFC] Set Returning Functions Tom Lane
• 13:27   Re: Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks Karel Zak
• 13:41   Re: Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks Karel Zak
• 14:57   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) Andrew Sullivan
• 16:31   Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Bill Cunningham
• 17:28   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Andrew Sullivan
• 17:54   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Oleg Bartunov
• 17:55   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Dave Page
• 19:34   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Andrew Sullivan
• 19:47   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Bill Cunningham
• 20:16   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 23:11   the parsing of parameters Neil Conway