Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead
Date
Msg-id 12342.1019705420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead  (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>)
Responses Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead  (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> writes:
> Grabbing bigger chunks is always optimal, AFICT, if they're not
> *too* big and you use the data. A single 64K read takes very little
> longer than a single 8K read.

Proof?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead