Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

24 April 2002

• 00:05   Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Peter Eisentraut
• 00:57   Re: Patch for xlog.c Bruce Momjian
• 00:58   Re: build of 7.2.1 on SCO Openserver and Unixware 7.1.1 Bruce Momjian
• 01:21   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 01:36   namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Rod Taylor
• 01:50   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Neil Conway
• 01:55   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 02:06   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 02:12   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Rod Taylor
• 03:38   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson
• 04:04   timeout implementation issues Nicolas Bazin
• 04:36   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 04:40   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Tom Lane
• 05:19   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:26   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Philip Warner
• 06:01   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Lincoln Yeoh
• 06:51   Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson
• 11:32   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw
• 12:44   Returning text from stored procedures?? Steffen Nielsen
• 12:55   Re: "make report" Thomas Lockhart
• 12:56   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 12:57   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Bruce Momjian
• 13:03   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian
• 13:08   Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian
• 13:21   Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Tom Lane
• 13:23   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart
• 13:28   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 13:31   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 13:57   Table checking/dumping program Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:31   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: Returning text from stored procedures?? Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
• 15:53   Parser translations and schemas Tom Lane
• 16:03   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni
• 16:33   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Michael Loftis
• 17:09   Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut
• 17:18   Re: "make report" Igor Kovalenko
• 17:19   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 17:20   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Vince Vielhaber
• 17:22   Re: Parser translations and schemas Peter Eisentraut
• 17:28   Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut
• 20:15   Re: Implement a .NET Data Francisco Jr.
• 21:13   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane
• 21:50   PostgreSQL index usage discussion. mlw
• 22:41   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:05   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:39   Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck