Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date
Msg-id 3CC75BCE.83032A1E@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > >
> > > > I voted not only ? but also 2 and 3.
> > > > And haven't I asked twice or so if it's a vote ?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is a vote, and now that we see how everyone feels, we can
> > > decide what to do.
> > >
> > > Hiroshi, you can't vote for 2, 3, and ?.
> >
> > Why ?
> > I don't think the items are exclusive.
> 
> Well, 2 says roll back only after transaction aborts,

Sorry for my poor understanding.
Isn't it 1 ?

regards, 
Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction