Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 May 2002

• 00:45   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Ian Barwick
• 01:06   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:08   PureFTPd Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:11   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:17   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:20   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 02:32   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Ross J. Reedstrom
• 02:46   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Rod Taylor
• 03:03   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 03:12   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 03:39   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 03:49   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Ross J. Reedstrom
• 03:55   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 04:21   Re: [INTERFACES] Schemas: status report, call for developers Ross J. Reedstrom
• 08:09   Problem with restoring a 7.1 dump Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 11:23   Re: Problem with restoring a 7.1 dump Magnus Naeslund(f)
• 13:27   Analyze on large changes... Rod Taylor
• 13:35   Re: Problem with restoring a 7.1 dump Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: Analyze on large changes... Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: Analyze on large changes... Lincoln Yeoh
• 17:47   Re: Analyze on large changes... Tom Lane
• 17:50   PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 17:51   Re: the parsing of parameters Tom Lane
• 17:52   mV database tools Arthur@LinkLine.com
• 20:25   Re: mV database tools Oliver Elphick
• 21:26   Re: Mac OS X: system shutdown prevents checkpoint Peter Bierman
• 21:53   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Ian Barwick
• 22:07   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: mV database tools cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 22:17   insert with multiple targetLists Neil Conway
• 22:28   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 22:54   Re: insert with multiple targetLists Rod Taylor
• 22:59   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? David Terrell
• 23:32   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jan Wieck

2 May 2002

• 00:10   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 01:05   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Nigel J. Andrews
• 01:58   Re: insert with multiple targetLists Tom Lane
• 02:33   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 03:42   Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first? Lincoln Yeoh
• 03:45   Re: Mac OS X: system shutdown prevents checkpoint Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first? Tom Lane
• 04:46   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:24   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Hannu Krosing
• 06:02   mV database tools Arthur@LinkLine.com
• 06:25   mV database tools Arthur@LinkLine.com
• 06:47   Re: mV database tools Dave Page
• 06:59   PATCH SSL_pending() checks in libpq/fe-misc.c Jack Bates
• 07:19   a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:38   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Lincoln Yeoh
• 07:42   Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first? Lincoln Yeoh
• 07:52   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:21   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:44   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Dalibor Andzakovic
• 10:05   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Lincoln Yeoh
• 11:06   Re: mV database tools mlw
• 11:11   Re: mV database tools mlw
• 11:22   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 11:37   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 11:46   DROP TABLE hangs because of same table foreign key Louis-David Mitterrand
• 11:46   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Nigel J. Andrews
• 11:54   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 12:01   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 12:01   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 12:09   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Hannu Krosing
• 12:38   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:43   ... Umang Patel
• 12:44   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Jeffrey W. Baker
• 12:45   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Ian Barwick
• 13:13   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Rod Taylor
• 13:14   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Hannu Krosing
• 13:15   Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first? Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: DROP TABLE hangs because of same table foreign key Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Oleg Bartunov
• 14:31   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jean-Michel POURE
• 14:44   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Lamar Owen
• 14:45   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: DROP TABLE hangs because of same table foreign key Stephan Szabo
• 16:38   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Marc G. Fournier
• 16:40   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 16:47   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Marc G. Fournier
• 17:04   postgres 7.2.1 on redhat 7.1 Steve King
• 17:05   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Marc G. Fournier
• 17:19   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 17:31   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 17:38   Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax Manfred Koizar
• 18:13   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Scott Marlowe
• 18:44   replication questions Doug Needham
• 20:00   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Jeffrey W. Baker
• 20:06   Re: postgres 7.2.1 on redhat 7.1 Lamar Owen
• 20:13   Fw: PostgreSQL mission statement? Arthur@LinkLine.com
• 20:13   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jan Wieck
• 20:41   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Scott Marlowe
• 20:50   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Michael E. Locasto
• 21:07   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax Tom Lane
• 21:22   Consistency problem with unlabeled intervals Tom Lane
• 21:50   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jason Earl
• 21:57   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Mark kirkwood
• 22:19   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Scott Marlowe
• 22:41   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:04   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax Manfred Koizar
• 23:52   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Thomas Lockhart
• 23:58   Re: replication questions Darren Johnson
• 23:59   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 23:59   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 23:59   Re: Consistency problem with unlabeled intervals Thomas Lockhart

3 May 2002

• 00:30   Re: [GENERAL] DLM Oracle/Compaq/OpenVMS Thomas Lockhart
• 00:31   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax Tom Lane
• 00:33   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 00:56   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 00:58   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 01:03   Re: Consistency problem with unlabeled intervals Tom Lane
• 01:29   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jim Mercer
• 01:33   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Dann Corbit
• 01:51   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? mlw
• 01:56   Solaris + locale bug identified Tom Lane
• 02:06   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Dalibor Andzakovic
• 02:32   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Lincoln Yeoh
• 03:01   Re: replication questions Doug Needham
• 06:17   3 digit year problem Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:36   Trying to reduce per tuple overhead (bitmap) Manfred Koizar
• 06:50   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax Manfred Koizar
• 07:11   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Bradley Kieser
• 07:47   Compilation failed when --with-recode specified (patch) Oliver Elphick
• 11:29   Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Magnus Enbom
• 11:34   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:13   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:18   HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 12:24   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Marc G. Fournier
• 12:28   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports mlw
• 12:47   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 12:55   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Travis Hoyt
• 13:01   Re: Trying to reduce per tuple overhead (bitmap) Tom Lane
• 13:01   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 13:14   Re: 3 digit year problem Thomas Lockhart
• 13:15   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 13:47   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Justin Clift
• 13:48   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 13:48   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Hannu Krosing
• 13:48   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 13:49   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 14:08   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports mlw
• 14:22   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports mlw
• 14:28   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports mlw
• 16:20   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Jason Earl
• 16:21   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Scott Marlowe
• 16:24   set constraints behavior Neil Conway
• 16:44   Re: set constraints behavior Stephan Szabo
• 16:45   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports mlw
• 16:45   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Lamar Owen
• 17:18   Re: set constraints behavior Neil Conway
• 17:47   Re: set constraints behavior Stephan Szabo
• 18:18   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 18:46   Re: set constraints behavior Tom Lane
• 18:52   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:44   Re: Compilation failed when --with-recode specified (patch) Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Ron Chmara
• 20:34   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 20:58   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Florian Weimer
• 21:07   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports mlw
• 22:20   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 22:47   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:57   Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:05   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Tom Lane

4 May 2002

• 09:00   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Matthew Kirkwood
• 10:02   Auto-reload of dynamic libraries Gavin Sherry
• 12:33   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Joel Burton
• 12:50   Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime mlw
• 13:08   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:25   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Justin Clift
• 13:28   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime mlw
• 14:11   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [PATCHES] Auto-reload of dynamic libraries Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime mlw
• 15:37   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 15:56   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:08   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane

5 May 2002

• 05:44   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Joel Burton
• 06:14   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Dann Corbit
• 07:40   help Vladimir Zolotykh
• 07:54   Re: Execution time of UPDATE raises dramatically! Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:07   Bad timestamp external representation 'Sun 05 May 11:53:44.731416 2002 EEST' Vladimir Zolotykh
• 13:06   Musings mlw
• 13:21   Re: Musings cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 13:44   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: Musings Gavin Sherry
• 13:52   Re: Musings Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: Musings mlw
• 16:49   Re: pg_config Makefile includes hyphens in configure arguments Peter Eisentraut
• 17:01   Re: Musings Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: Musings Tom Lane
• 18:11   STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1 Jack Bates
• 18:12   Re: Musings cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 18:34   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Cyril VELTER
• 19:10   Re: Musings mlw
• 20:49   Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Manfred Koizar
• 21:07   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Neil Conway
• 21:54   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Manfred Koizar
• 22:14   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:21   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Tom Lane
• 22:41   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:59   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Neil Conway

6 May 2002

• 00:21   Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1 Lamar Owen
• 00:43   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:49   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Tom Lane
• 00:49   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:07   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:43   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Marc G. Fournier
• 02:43   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Marc G. Fournier
• 02:51   Re: Musings Tom Lane
• 03:00   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Tom Lane
• 03:15   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime mlw
• 03:20   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Tom Lane
• 05:19   Re: Musings Thomas Lockhart
• 06:37   Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Christof Petig
• 06:49   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Christof Petig
• 07:31   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Cyril VELTER
• 08:48   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Hannu Krosing
• 09:24   Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Lee Kindness
• 09:58   Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Michael Meskes
• 10:04   Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Michael Meskes
• 10:09   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Joel Burton
• 10:51   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 10:54   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 10:55   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Joel Burton
• 10:56   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 11:01   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 11:02   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Marc G. Fournier
• 11:02   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 11:11   Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc Ron Snyder
• 11:12   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Hannu Krosing
• 12:59   Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG: FETCH ALL|n FROM cursor - Memory allocation? Christof Petig
• 13:11   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Tom Lane
• 13:11   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 13:11   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 14:09   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 14:30   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Marc G. Fournier
• 14:52   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Nigel J. Andrews
• 15:38   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 16:41   Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment Joe Conway
• 17:34   a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and additional Alter ownerships commands. Ryan Bradetich
• 17:42   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Cyril VELTER
• 18:03   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Jan Wieck
• 18:34   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Nigel J. Andrews
• 19:09   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and additional Joe Conway
• 20:16   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Nigel J. Andrews
• 21:24   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 21:57   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and Ryan Bradetich
• 22:20   Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime Marc G. Fournier
• 22:31   pgsql_data/base mapping Laurette Cisneros
• 22:52   Re: pgsql_data/base mapping Jeff Davis

7 May 2002

• 00:09   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:53   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Rod Taylor
• 00:56   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:11   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:25   Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Test Case Mark kirkwood
• 09:33   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Nigel J. Andrews
• 10:25   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Matthew Kirkwood
• 11:39   Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1 
• 11:39   Re: IF- statements in a rule's 'DO INSTEAD SELECT ...'- statement Bertin, Philippe
• 11:40   code contribution Alex Shevlakov
• 13:00   OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 13:07   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 13:08   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Tom Lane
• 13:18   pg_sema.h Rod Taylor
• 13:21   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Test Case Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Matthew Kirkwood
• 13:30   Re: code contribution Thomas Lockhart
• 14:21   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 14:40   Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 15:40   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Marc G. Fournier
• 15:50   Re: OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 16:05   Re: IF- statements in a rule's 'DO INSTEAD SELECT ...'- statement Alvaro Herrera
• 16:08   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Hannu Krosing
• 16:09   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Hannu Krosing
• 16:17   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Marc G. Fournier
• 16:36   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment Tom Lane
• 16:44   Re: pg_sema.h Rod Taylor
• 16:47   Re: pg_sema.h Tom Lane
• 17:00   7.1.3: pg_dump hierarchy problem Kovacs Zoltan
• 17:30   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review Joe Conway
• 17:43   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 17:52   How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 17:59   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Marc G. Fournier
• 18:18   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 18:19   Re: OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 18:46   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Marc G. Fournier
• 19:10   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 19:25   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 19:58   Couple of schema queries... Dave Page
• 20:23   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 20:27   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 20:42   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Hannu Krosing
• 20:43   Re: OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 20:43   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 20:43   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Igor Kovalenko
• 21:20   Re: OK, lets talk portability. mlw
• 21:28   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 21:28   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dann Corbit
• 21:29   Re: OK, lets talk portability. cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com

8 May 2002

• 00:42   Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and Ryan Bradetich
• 00:57   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:05   Re: code contribution Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:26   Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:35   Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and Ryan Bradetich
• 02:11   Creating new system catalog Lee, Shawn
• 02:26   Re: Creating new system catalog Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:32   Re: Couple of schema queries... Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and Joe Conway
• 03:03   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Marc G. Fournier
• 03:49   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:17   Re: Creating new system catalog Tom Lane
• 07:37   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:03   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:06   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:20   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Matthew Kirkwood
• 09:12   Cygwin / Debian dpkg / PostgreSQL / KDE2 and 3 Jean-Michel POURE
• 09:45   Re: Cygwin / Debian dpkg / PostgreSQL / KDE2 and 3 Tille, Andreas
• 13:07   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Hannu Krosing
• 13:32   Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 13:32   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Neil Conway
• 13:43   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 13:43   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Joel Burton
• 13:43   postgresql 7.1 file descriptor jade
• 13:49   Re: code contribution Alex Shevlakov
• 13:58   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Marc G. Fournier
• 14:21   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Joel Burton
• 16:12   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Joel Burton
• 16:14   Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Lee Kindness
• 16:14   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Manfred Koizar
• 16:24   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Thomas Lockhart
• 16:24   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Tom Lane
• 16:28   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 16:34   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 16:40   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 16:40   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Joel Burton
• 16:41   Re: postgresql 7.1 file descriptor mlw
• 16:51   Re: postgresql 7.1 file descriptor Tom Lane
• 16:54   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Thomas Lockhart
• 16:55   Bad side-effect from making EXPLAIN return a select result Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Manfred Koizar
• 17:06   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Marc G. Fournier
• 17:14   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 17:19   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 17:21   Re: postgresql 7.1 file descriptor Scott Marlowe
• 18:26   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 19:04   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Lamar Owen
• 19:36   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jason Earl
• 19:46   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 20:02   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Paul Ramsey
• 20:09   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy mlw
• 20:46   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Tom Lane
• 21:10   pg_ctl -v Laurette Cisneros
• 21:40   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Rod Taylor
• 21:52   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Joel Burton
• 22:00   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Joel Burton
• 22:38   Queries using rules show no rows modified? Michael Alan Dorman
• 22:42   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Dann Corbit
• 23:14   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:21   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Nicolas Bazin
• 23:25   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Matthew Kirkwood

9 May 2002

• 00:27   Re: Bad side-effect from making EXPLAIN return a select Joe Conway
• 01:08   Regression tests and NOTICE statements Rod Taylor
• 01:52   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Igor Kovalenko
• 02:16   7.2 html docs Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:55   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Joel Burton
• 03:10   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:12   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Tom Lane
• 04:19   Re: pg_ctl -v Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 04:28   Re: Regression tests and NOTICE statements Tom Lane
• 06:15   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dave Page
• 06:23   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Lincoln Yeoh
• 06:26   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Karel Zak
• 06:42   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Dave Page
• 06:56   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Hannu Krosing
• 07:05   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Dave Page
• 07:09   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Jean-Michel POURE
• 07:12   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jean-Michel POURE
• 07:16   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Jean-Michel POURE
• 07:53   Why you should Join W32/Debian to save the world from Microsoft Jean-Michel POURE
• 08:26   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Test Mark kirkwood
• 08:51   PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL porta biliy) Henshall, Stuart - WCP
• 09:08   Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader Manfred Koizar
• 09:13   Re: OK, lets talk portability. Lamar Owen
• 10:51   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Marc G. Fournier
• 11:16   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals pimlott@idiomtech.com (Andrew Pimlott)
• 11:17   Re: [SQL] postgresql 7.1 file descriptor jade
• 12:05   Re: Regression tests and NOTICE statements Rod Taylor
• 12:15   Fw: Regression tests and NOTICE statements Rod Taylor
• 12:31   pgaccess Iavor Raytchev
• 12:49   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jan Wieck
• 12:58   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Doug McNaught
• 12:58   Re: PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL porta biliy) Tom Lane
• 12:58   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Michael Alan Dorman
• 13:10   Re: Regression tests and NOTICE statements Tom Lane
• 13:11   Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports Jan Wieck
• 13:13   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 13:26   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Lee Kindness
• 13:32   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 13:43   Re: PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL porta biliy) Cyril VELTER
• 13:44   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 14:23   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:35   Re: Why you should Join W32/Debian to save the world from Microsoft Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:55   Re: pgaccess Iavor Raytchev
• 15:01   Re: pg_ctl -v Laurette Cisneros
• 15:14   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Michael Alan Dorman
• 15:23   Re: pgaccess Thomas Lockhart
• 15:37   Re: PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL Barry Lind
• 15:37   Re: PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL Barry Lind
• 15:50   Issues tangential to win32 support Scott Marlowe
• 15:50   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jan Wieck
• 15:50   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Barry Lind
• 16:04   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Christopher Browne
• 16:15   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 16:32   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 16:32   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Steve Wampler
• 16:38   Re: pgaccess Nigel J. Andrews
• 16:39   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Jan Wieck
• 16:39   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Jan Wieck
• 16:56   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jean-Michel POURE
• 16:56   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support mlw
• 16:56   troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 16:56   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 16:56   Re: Why you should Join W32/Debian to save the world from Microsoft Jean-Michel POURE
• 16:57   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Jan Wieck
• 17:22   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Cyril VELTER
• 17:24   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Scott Marlowe
• 17:24   Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy Lamar Owen
• 17:42   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? mlw
• 17:44   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Michael Alan Dorman
• 17:50   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Jan Wieck
• 18:28   Re: PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL Jan Wieck
• 19:15   Re: troubleshooting pointers Valentine Zaretsky
• 19:24   www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) Iavor Raytchev
• 19:34   Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 19:53   Re: the parsing of parameters Jan Wieck
• 20:08   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Hannu Krosing
• 20:08   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) Iavor Raytchev
• 20:14   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Hannu Krosing
• 20:16   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support mlw
• 20:20   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Hannu Krosing
• 20:33   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Hannu Krosing
• 20:35   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Dann Corbit
• 20:46   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support mlw
• 20:50   Re: the parsing of parameters Tom Lane
• 20:52   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Dann Corbit
• 20:56   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Hannu Krosing
• 21:01   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support mlw
• 21:13   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Dann Corbit
• 21:19   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Hannu Krosing
• 21:33   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Dann Corbit
• 21:39   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support mlw
• 21:45   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Dann Corbit
• 21:56   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support mlw
• 22:27   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw Marc G. Fournier
• 22:30   Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 22:49   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw Nigel J. Andrews

10 May 2002

• 00:01   Re: How much work is a native Windows application? Ernesto Gutierrez
• 00:15   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:27   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: Issues tangential to win32 support Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:59   Re: non-standard escapes in string literals Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:35   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:59   Threads vs processes - The Apache Way (Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy) Robert
• 07:36   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Hannu Krosing
• 08:47   Two pieces of information about Cygwin installer Jean-Michel POURE
• 09:14   Re: the parsing of parameters Jan Wieck
• 09:30   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Jan Wieck
• 09:30   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Jan Wieck
• 10:13   Nested transactions RFC Manfred Koizar
• 10:21   Re: Threads vs processes - The Apache Way (Re: Path to PostgreSQL mlw
• 10:58   pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Jean-Michel POURE
• 11:12   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ mlw
• 11:37   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Jean-Michel POURE
• 11:41   Re: pgaccess Ross J. Reedstrom
• 11:41   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 11:41   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) Bartus Levente
• 11:41   internal voting Iavor Raytchev
• 11:41   Cygwin Setup.exe future Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:20   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Nikolay Mihaylov
• 12:21   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ mlw
• 12:31   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Justin Clift
• 12:31   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:39   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ mlw
• 12:57   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:59   FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Dave Page
• 13:28   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ mlw
• 13:51   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: pgAdmin2 to be included in Dev-C++ Jean-Michel POURE
• 14:00   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: the parsing of parameters Tom Lane
• 14:44   Re: internal voting Brett Schwarz
• 15:03   Re: Threads vs processes - The Apache Way (Re: Path to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: the parsing of parameters Karel Zak
• 15:32   Re: FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Joel Burton
• 15:56   Re: FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Joel Burton
• 16:04   Re: Threads vs processes - The Apache Way (Re: Path to PostgreSQL mlw
• 16:11   Re: the parsing of parameters Jan Wieck
• 16:15   Re: the parsing of parameters Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Test Case Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 17:40   Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: pgaccess Peter Eisentraut
• 18:35   Re: the parsing of parameters Jan Wieck
• 19:12   Re: pgaccess Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:42   Monitoring backend activities Daniel H. F. e Silva
• 20:25   Making the regression tests locale-proof Peter Eisentraut
• 20:30   Native Win32, How about this? mlw
• 20:40   Re: Monitoring backend activities cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 20:46   Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 20:50   Re: Native Win32, How about this? Hannu Krosing
• 21:00   Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof Hannu Krosing
• 21:45   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Test Hannu Krosing
• 22:23   Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof Tom Lane
• 22:26   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Test Tom Lane

11 May 2002

• 00:07   Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof Alvaro Herrera
• 00:19   Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof Tom Lane
• 00:34   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:38   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:43   Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 01:09   Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane
• 03:04   Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 05:03   bug? in current cvs with bigint datatype Barry Lind
• 13:57   Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Native Win32, How about this? cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 14:52   Re: Nested transactions RFC Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review and comment Ian Barwick
• 15:07   Re: bug? in current cvs with bigint datatype Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: internal voting Nigel J. Andrews
• 22:17   Re: Nested transactions RFC Manfred Koizar

12 May 2002

• 02:29   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review Joe Conway
• 02:35   Re: troubleshooting pointers Joe Conway
• 13:27   Re: FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Jason Tishler
• 14:32   Re: Nested transactions RFC Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: troubleshooting pointers Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: Making the regression tests locale-proof Peter Eisentraut
• 14:55   TRUNCATE Rod Taylor
• 14:56   Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review Ian Barwick
• 15:30   Re: TRUNCATE Tom Lane
• 15:40   Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor
• 16:23   Re: Nested transactions RFC Stephan Szabo
• 16:46   Re: PostgreSQL mission statement? Patrick Welche
• 18:48   Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton
• 20:03   Operator Comments Dave Page
• 20:36   Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor
• 21:50   Re: Operator Comments Rod Taylor
• 22:26   Re: Operator Comments Tom Lane
• 23:52   Re: Nested transactions RFC Hiroshi Inoue

13 May 2002

• 00:54   Re: Operator Comments Rod Taylor
• 01:17   Re: TRUNCATE Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:12   Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton
• 03:15   Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton
• 03:25   Re: TRUNCATE nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
• 04:14   Re: TRUNCATE Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 10:48   Re: Operator Comments Mike Mascari
• 11:19   Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor
• 11:49   Join of small table with large table large scale
• 11:49   Re: internal voting Peter Eisentraut
• 11:50   pgaccess - the discussion is over Iavor Raytchev
• 11:50   Re: internal voting Ross J. Reedstrom
• 11:50   Re: internal voting Thomas Lockhart
• 11:50   Re: internal voting Iavor Raytchev
• 11:51   Re: internal voting Thomas Lockhart
• 11:51   pgaccess.org - invitation for a working meeting Iavor Raytchev
• 11:52   Re: internal voting Iavor Raytchev
• 11:52   what do people use pgaccess for? Iavor Raytchev
• 11:53   Re: what do people use pgaccess for? Marc G. Fournier
• 11:56   Re: internal voting Peter Eisentraut
• 11:56   Re: internal voting Bartus Levente
• 11:58   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB Enke, Michael
• 11:59   Easy upgrade Doug Hughes
• 12:09   Re: internal voting Nigel J. Andrews
• 12:21   Re: internal voting Tom Lane
• 13:19   strange explain Oleg Bartunov
• 13:57   Re: Native Win32, How about this? Jason Tishler
• 14:02   Re: strange explain Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: Join of small table with large table Rod Taylor
• 14:08   Re: Join of small table with large table Rod Taylor
• 14:30   Re: Join of small table with large table Tom Lane
• 14:50   Re: strange explain Rod Taylor
• 15:11   Re: strange explain Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: Join of small table with large table Stephan Szabo
• 17:50   Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over mlw
• 18:15   Re: strange explain Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: strange explain Oleg Bartunov
• 18:45   Re: strange explain Oleg Bartunov
• 20:47   Re: TRUNCATE Joel Burton
• 20:59   pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane
• 21:22   Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over C. Maj
• 22:48   Interval precision busted? Tom Lane
• 23:13   Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Lamar Owen

14 May 2002

• 00:07   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Rod Taylor
• 00:25   Re: TRUNCATE Rod Taylor
• 00:27   What's the meaning of system column in views Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:28   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
• 00:28   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane
• 00:28   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane
• 00:40   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Rod Taylor
• 00:48   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane
• 01:11   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:16   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Rod Taylor
• 01:27   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane
• 01:57   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane
• 02:04   Re: What's the meaning of system column in views Tom Lane
• 03:15   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Marc G. Fournier
• 03:30   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:58   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Oliver Elphick
• 05:08   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Tom Lane
• 05:29   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Oliver Elphick
• 05:35   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Jean-Michel POURE
• 05:39   Re: strange explain Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 06:20   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Hannu Krosing
• 06:35   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Hannu Krosing
• 06:54   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:30   Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths Lincoln Yeoh
• 11:06   Current anon cvs does not generate GNUmakefile Oliver Elphick
• 11:40   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Hannu Krosing
• 11:51   Re: Current anon cvs does not generate GNUmakefile Oliver Elphick
• 12:20   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:39   Re: Interval precision busted? Thomas Lockhart
• 12:40   Re: strange explain Tom Lane
• 12:52   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane
• 13:23   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Jan Wieck
• 13:41   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Myron Scott
• 16:08   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Tom Lane
• 16:23   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) Myron Scott
• 16:32   Global Variables (Was: Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) ) Marc G. Fournier
• 17:02   Final(?) proposal on GUC hook extensions Tom Lane
• 19:33   7.2.2 ? Oleg Bartunov
• 21:02   Re: 7.2.2 ? Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: [SQL] can't cast varchar as integer? Scott Royston

15 May 2002

• 00:15   Array iterators Rod Taylor
• 02:45   Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess Marc G. Fournier
• 02:47   Re: 7.2.2 ? Marc G. Fournier
• 03:11   Re: 7.2.2 ? Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: 7.2.2 ? Marc G. Fournier
• 03:23   Re: Global Variables (Was: Re: Discontent with development mlw
• 03:50   Re: Array iterators Tom Lane
• 06:14   Re: Array iterators Nicolas Bazin
• 10:55   Re: Array iterators Rod Taylor
• 11:44   Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Daniel
• 13:13   Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Tom Lane
• 23:16   A fairly obvious optimization? Dann Corbit

16 May 2002

• 00:16   Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Daniel
• 07:07   Re: A fairly obvious optimization? Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 07:24   Re: A fairly obvious optimization? Hannu Krosing
• 09:11   Money type D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 09:52   Re: Money type Karel Zak
• 10:48   WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Joerg Hessdoerfer
• 12:38   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Marc G. Fournier
• 12:58   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Hannu Krosing
• 13:07   Re: Money type Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Bear Giles
• 16:24   Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Peter Eisentraut
• 16:24   Re: Kerberos principal to dbuser mapping Peter Eisentraut
• 17:11   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton
• 18:18   resetting stats on the fly Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 18:54   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Andrew Sullivan
• 19:04   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Mike Mascari
• 19:10   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Magnus Naeslund(f)
• 19:30   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Michael Alan Dorman
• 19:36   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Joerg Hessdoerfer
• 21:49   libpgtcl - backend version information patch Nigel J. Andrews
• 22:51   interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Joe Conway
• 23:15   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Magnus Naeslund(f)

17 May 2002

• 01:00   minor CVS regression Neil Conway
• 01:10   Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: minor CVS regression Tom Lane
• 01:28   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 15:58   More schema queries Dave Page
• 15:58   Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Alvaro Herrera
• 15:58   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Marc G. Fournier
• 16:37   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Tom Lane
• 16:40   Future plans Michael Meskes
• 16:40   Poster(s) needed Michael Meskes
• 16:40   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton
• 16:51   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Peter Eisentraut
• 16:53   Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information patch Peter Eisentraut
• 16:59   Re: Queries using rules show no rows modified? Manfred Koizar
• 17:42   Trouble with pg_encoding_to_char youenn.ballouard2@etud.univ-ubs.fr
• 17:43   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Enke, Michael
• 17:47   Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) Mike Embry
• 19:11   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Manfred Koizar
• 19:21   SSL client cert patch submitted Bear Giles
• 19:42   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 21:24   Re: +AFs-HACKERS+AF0- More schema queries Dave Page
• 21:24   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 21:43   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 21:59   Error on PQputline() Dann Corbit
• 22:02   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 22:10   Re: Error on PQputline() Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: Error on PQputline() Dann Corbit
• 22:23   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: Error on PQputline() Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: Error on PQputline() Dann Corbit
• 22:52   Re: Error on PQputline() Tom Lane

18 May 2002

• 03:34   Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara
• 04:56   Re: Poster(s) needed Marc G. Fournier
• 08:06   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 09:40   Re: Poster(s) needed Lincoln Yeoh
• 12:58   Re: WIN32 native ... lets start?!? Joerg Hessdoerfer
• 13:51   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton
• 14:22   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Tom Lane
• 14:45   Sequence privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 14:48   Re: Poster(s) needed Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: Trouble with pg_encoding_to_char Barry Lind
• 15:24   Re: Sequence privileges Tom Lane
• 15:54   UTF-8 safe ascii() function Jean-Michel POURE
• 16:39   SASL, compression? Bear Giles
• 17:13   Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information patch Nigel J. Andrews
• 17:38   pq_eof() broken with SSL Bear Giles
• 17:52   *new* libpgtcl - backend version information patch Nigel J. Andrews
• 18:05   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Joel Burton
• 18:09   Set-returning function syntax Joel Burton
• 18:19   Re: SASL, compression? Neil Conway
• 18:26   Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: SASL, compression? Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information patch Tom Lane
• 19:33   Re: SASL, compression? Bear Giles
• 20:11   Re: SASL, compression? Bear Giles
• 20:41   Re: [INTERFACES] libpgtcl - backend version information Nigel J. Andrews
• 21:16   Re: Set-returning function syntax Joe Conway
• 22:23   Re: Sequence privileges Joe Conway
• 22:45   Re: Sequence privileges Tom Lane
• 23:00   Re: Sequence privileges Neil Conway
• 23:05   Re: Set-returning function syntax Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:18   Re: Set-returning function syntax Tom Lane
• 23:21   Re: Set-returning function syntax Joe Conway
• 23:56   Re: Set-returning function syntax Joe Conway

19 May 2002

• 01:35   Re: Set-returning function syntax Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:03   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Mark kirkwood
• 14:17   Re: pq_eof() broken with SSL Peter Eisentraut
• 16:38   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Tom Lane
• 17:53   ScanCommandId should become part of snapshot Tom Lane
• 19:04   Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Michael Meskes
• 19:09   Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Michael Meskes
• 19:19   Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: [PATCHES] SRF patch (was Re: troubleshooting pointers) Joe Conway
• 20:03   Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Joel Burton
• 20:24   Re: [PATCHES] SRF patch (was Re: troubleshooting pointers) Tom Lane
• 20:29   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Joe Conway
• 20:30   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Joel Burton
• 20:41   Re: pq_eof() broken with SSL Bear Giles
• 21:24   Indexscan API cleanup proposal Tom Lane
• 21:24   bt_fixroot: not valid old root page Jim Buttafuoco
• 21:39   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: Indexscan API cleanup proposal Joe Conway
• 21:52   Re: Indexscan API cleanup proposal Tom Lane

20 May 2002

• 05:25   Re: SASL, compression? Lincoln Yeoh
• 05:48   revised SSL patches submitted Bear Giles
• 06:13   Re: SASL, compression? Bear Giles
• 07:26   Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:08   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ... Michael Meskes
• 10:55   Re: SASL, compression? Lincoln Yeoh
• 12:31   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Hannu Krosing
• 12:57   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 13:12   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Tom Lane
• 13:18   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 13:19   Re: More schema queries Hannu Krosing
• 13:34   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ... Tom Lane
• 13:40   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Hannu Krosing
• 14:08   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 14:28   Re: SASL, compression? Bear Giles
• 14:28   timestamp-to-date broken in current sources Tom Lane
• 14:55   more on makecert and pgkeygen Bear Giles
• 15:33   Re: timestamp-to-date broken in current sources Thomas Lockhart
• 17:20   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 18:03   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara
• 18:04   First cut at mkcert Bear Giles
• 19:33   Language-specific initialization actions Peter Eisentraut
• 19:34   Use of /etc/services? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:35   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 19:49   First cut at SSL documentation Bear Giles
• 21:18   Re: Future plans Hannu Krosing
• 21:18   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting 
• 22:00   I am online today Bruce Momjian
• 22:59   getting oid of tuple in executePlan Dhruv Pilania
• 22:59   SRF rescan testing Joe Conway
• 23:02   JDBC with SSL for postgresql Rich Elwyn
• 23:43   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: Language-specific initialization actions Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara

21 May 2002

• 02:12   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 02:52   Re: [GENERAL] Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat 7.3 Lamar Owen
• 06:20   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog preproc/ec ... Michael Meskes
• 07:14   Re: Future plans Michael Meskes
• 09:30   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 09:54   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID Manfred Koizar
• 10:02   Re: Future plans Hannu Krosing
• 12:22   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 12:35   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: [GENERAL] Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat7.3 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:01   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 14:07   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara
• 14:37   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 14:41   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID Manfred Koizar
• 15:00   Is 7.3 a good time to increase NAMEDATALEN ? Joel Burton
• 16:03   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID Tom Lane
• 16:30   Re: [GENERAL] Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat 7.3 Lamar Owen
• 16:30   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 16:35   Re: [GENERAL] Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat 7.3 Thomas Lockhart
• 16:57   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Manfred Koizar
• 16:57   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 16:58   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 16:58   Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 18:29   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID Manfred Koizar
• 18:45   Re: getting oid of tuple in executePlan Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID Tom Lane
• 19:05   Re: Is 7.3 a good time to increase NAMEDATALEN ? Tom Lane
• 20:35   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara
• 20:39   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 21:01   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 21:01   Re: Is 7.3 a good time to increase NAMEDATALEN ? Neil Conway
• 21:04   Re: More schema queries Tom Lane
• 21:08   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 21:28   2nd cut at SSL documentation Bear Giles
• 21:30   Re: More schema queries Dave Page
• 21:35   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Hannu Krosing
• 21:45   Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting Mark kirkwood
• 21:55   Graphical Tool Gaston Micheri
• 22:27   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Oliver Elphick
• 22:30   [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation Bear Giles
• 22:49   Shouldn't large objects be MVCC-aware? Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 23:10   Re: Is 7.3 a good time to increase NAMEDATALEN ? Dann Corbit
• 23:12   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: 2nd cut at SSL documentation Neil Conway
• 23:44   Timestamp & Interval - Part 1 Josh Berkus
• 23:45   Wrong dependency in parallel regression test Peter Eisentraut

22 May 2002

• 00:09   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Peter Eisentraut
• 00:41   Re: Timestamp & Interval - Part 1 Thomas Lockhart
• 00:44   Re: Timestamp & Interval - Part 1 Dann Corbit
• 01:01   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 01:21   Re: Timestamp & Interval - Part 1 Thomas Lockhart
• 02:49   Re: Is 7.3 a good time to increase NAMEDATALEN ? Tom Lane
• 03:19   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Oliver Elphick
• 03:31   Re: Wrong dependency in parallel regression test Tom Lane
• 05:35   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Hannu Krosing
• 07:23   Intrerval oddities Oliver Elphick
• 08:51   Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts Michael Meskes
• 09:29   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 11:18   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Hannu Krosing
• 12:10   Re: [GENERAL] psql -l gives bad output Ron Snyder
• 12:33   ... Shra
• 12:34   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 12:49   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Tom Lane
• 12:49   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Hannu Krosing
• 13:06   Edge case problem with pg_dump D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 13:06   index a datatype Ewald Geschwinde
• 13:06   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lee Kindness
• 13:06   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 13:38   Re: Jan Wieck
• 13:38   Re: Interval oddities Thomas Lockhart
• 13:38   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 13:39   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Tom Lane
• 14:05   Re: [SQL] Bug with Daylight Savings Time & Interval Oliver Elphick
• 14:40   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Jan Wieck
• 14:56   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Tom Lane
• 15:22   Internal state in sequence.c is a bad idea Tom Lane
• 16:16   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Jan Wieck
• 16:29   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 17:29   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 18:10   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Manuel Sugawara
• 18:14   ksqo? Neil Conway
• 18:23   A more precise polygon_overlap() Kenneth Chan
• 19:01   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Manfred Koizar
• 19:44   Re: A more precise polygon_overlap() Dann Corbit
• 20:14   Re: A more precise polygon_overlap() Dann Corbit
• 20:56   Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed Tom Lane
• 21:03   Re: ksqo? Tom Lane
• 21:37   Me in California Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:08   Re: A more precise polygon_overlap() Paul Ramsey
• 23:20   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 23:26   Security policy Bear Giles
• 23:31   Re: Interval oddities Thomas Lockhart
• 23:49   Re: Interval oddities Josh Berkus

23 May 2002

• 00:12   Re: Interval oddities Thomas Lockhart
• 00:14   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:50   Re: 2nd cut at SSL documentation Nigel J. Andrews
• 00:53   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 01:19   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Magnus Naeslund(f)
• 07:40   bison Michael Meskes
• 07:55   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Michael Meskes
• 09:19   tuples gone? Daniel Kalchev
• 10:32   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 11:48   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Ulrich Drepper
• 11:49   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Ulrich Drepper
• 11:49   Security policy Bear Giles
• 11:49   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Ulrich Drepper
• 13:12   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Tom Lane
• 13:18   Re: tuples gone? Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Michael Meskes
• 13:53   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Marc G. Fournier
• 13:53   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Marc G. Fournier
• 13:54   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 14:35   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: tuples gone? Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 16:50   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 17:59   Really stupid question(?) Bear Giles
• 19:10   Re: Really stupid question(?) Tom Lane
• 19:29   Re: Really stupid question(?) Joe Conway
• 23:12   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Marc G. Fournier

24 May 2002

• 00:10   Re: ksqo? Neil Conway
• 03:30   Re: ksqo? Tom Lane
• 05:25   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Oliver Elphick
• 06:06   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Michael Meskes
• 12:10   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 12:51   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
• 13:16   Internal flowchart Michael Meskes
• 13:24   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Joel Burton
• 15:01   How to add big amounts of data into database? Olonichev Sergei
• 16:31   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Joe Conway
• 16:39   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Tom Lane
• 16:57   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 18:14   Tcl build fix attempted Peter Eisentraut
• 18:18   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Peter Eisentraut
• 18:20   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Joel Burton
• 19:44   Index tuple killing code committed Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: Index tuple killing code committed Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 20:28   Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: Index tuple killing code committed Joe Conway
• 20:51   Re: Index tuple killing code committed Hannu Krosing
• 21:09   Re: Index tuple killing code committed Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Joe Conway
• 22:35   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 22:41   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 23:04   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Thomas Lockhart
• 23:11   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com

25 May 2002

• 00:56   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Nigel J. Andrews
• 05:34   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Philip Warner
• 08:31   strange update problem with 7.2.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 08:33   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 13:47   pgstatindex Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:45   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 16:07   Getting rid of ReferentialIntegritySnapshotOverride Tom Lane
• 16:29   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 17:21   Think I see a btree vacuuming bug Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Michael Meskes
• 20:45   Re: Internal flowchart Bruce Momjian
• 21:01   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Brent Verner
• 21:05   Re: Edge case problem with pg_dump Brent Verner
• 21:45   Re: Temp tables are curious creatures.... Bruce Momjian

26 May 2002

• 00:25   Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:32   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Marc G. Fournier
• 03:43   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Bruce Momjian
• 05:24   sample SRF: SHOW ALL equiv C function returning setof composite Joe Conway
• 05:27   Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL Ian Barwick
• 05:32   COPY and views Neil Conway
• 10:13   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Teodor Sigaev
• 12:05   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 14:11   Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL Joe Conway
• 14:37   Re: COPY and views Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL Tom Lane
• 15:55   WAL FILES Olivier PRENANT
• 16:02   Re: Q: unexpected result from SRF in SQL Ian Barwick
• 16:56   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Ian Barwick
• 18:42   Re: pgstatindex Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers Tom Lane

27 May 2002

• 00:21   Re: pgstatindex Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:30   revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Joe Conway
• 01:26   Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Joe Conway
• 07:35   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Teodor Sigaev
• 07:59   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Teodor Sigaev
• 08:17   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Teodor Sigaev
• 09:17   Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug Manfred Koizar
• 11:35   Two smart guys are looking for contracts :-) Oleg Bartunov
• 14:40   Replication status meskes@postgresql.org (Michael Meskes)
• 14:41   Replication status Michael Meskes
• 14:55   Re: Replication status Michael Meskes
• 15:29   Invalid length of startup packet Henrik Steffen
• 15:38   Re: Replication status Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: Invalid length of startup packet Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: pgstatindex Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: Invalid length of startup packet Henrik Steffen
• 16:49   Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: Replication status Darren Johnson
• 19:25   Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Tom Lane
• 19:26   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Ulrich Drepper
• 19:26   is there any backend timeout undocumented? NunoACHenriques
• 19:27   Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Peter Eisentraut
• 20:21   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Ulrich Drepper
• 20:21   Re: SRF rescan testing Joe Conway
• 20:22   Re: SRF rescan testing Tom Lane
• 20:24   Re: Replication status Bruce Momjian
• 20:24   Re: SRF rescan testing Joe Conway
• 20:29   Re: WAL FILES Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   NO CREATE TABLE Marcia Abade
• 20:38   Re: is there any backend timeout undocumented? Tom Lane
• 21:54   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: is there any backend timeout undocumented? Manfred Koizar
• 22:10   Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Joe Conway
• 22:12   Re: is there any backend timeout undocumented? Neil Conway
• 22:13   Re: is there any backend timeout undocumented? Manuel Sugawara

28 May 2002

• 00:00   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Bruce Momjian
• 00:08   Re: pgstatindex Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:17   Re: the parsing of parameters Bruce Momjian
• 00:24   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Neil Conway
• 01:18   Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug Lamar Owen
• 04:00   Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Joe Conway
• 06:20   wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Louis-David Mitterrand
• 06:35   Re: Replication status Michael Meskes
• 06:38   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Teodor Sigaev
• 06:52   Invalid length of startup packet - solved! Henrik Steffen
• 08:12   Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug Manfred Koizar
• 10:26   Re: Replication status Karel Zak
• 11:07   Re: SRF rescan testing Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 11:29   Re: WAL FILES Olivier PRENANT
• 12:09   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Joel Burton
• 12:35   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: Replication status & point-in-time recovery Andrew Sullivan
• 13:51   cache lookup failed: hack pg_* tables? Kovacs Zoltan
• 13:53   Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Andrew Sullivan
• 14:10   Re: cache lookup failed: hack pg_* tables? Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Teodor Sigaev
• 14:14   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: cache lookup failed: hack pg_* tables? Kovacs Zoltan
• 14:28   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 14:28   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Peter Eisentraut
• 15:58   Perl build fix attempted Peter Eisentraut
• 16:44   Re: Replication status Steven Singer
• 16:46   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 17:07   Polygons passed to poly_overlap have 0 pts when column is indexed using rtree Kenneth Chan
• 18:01   Re: strange update problem with 7.2.1 Tom Lane
• 18:09   Null values in indexes Dann Corbit
• 18:12   Re: Polygons passed to poly_overlap have 0 pts when column is indexed using rtree Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: Null values in indexes Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: Interval oddities Josh Berkus
• 20:12   Re: Null values in indexes Hannu Krosing
• 20:18   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Hannu Krosing
• 20:36   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Joel Burton
• 20:49   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Hannu Krosing
• 21:12   Re: Interval oddities Thomas Lockhart
• 21:32   Re: Null values in indexes Tom Lane
• 22:18   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Tom Lane
• 23:36   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Bruce Momjian
• 23:43   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Bruce Momjian
• 23:50   Re: Replication status Bruce Momjian
• 23:50   Re: [GENERAL] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle Dann Corbit
• 23:54   Re: Replication status Bruce Momjian

29 May 2002

• 00:02   Re: WAL FILES Bruce Momjian
• 00:08   Re: Replication status Thomas Lockhart
• 00:33   Re: Replication status Bruce Momjian
• 00:47   Re: ksqo? Bruce Momjian
• 02:29   Re: Polygons passed to poly_overlap have 0 pts when column is indexed using rtree Tom Lane
• 09:28   Backend died abnormally Henrik Steffen
• 11:47   Re: Backend died abnormally Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: Null values in indexes Jan Wieck
• 13:48   Re: Polygons passed to poly_overlap have 0 pts when Kenneth Chan
• 15:10   Re: Null values in indexes Tom Lane
• 16:00   Re: Null values in indexes Dann Corbit
• 16:21   Re: Null values in indexes Paul Ramsey
• 16:24   Re: Null values in indexes Tom Lane
• 23:45   ipv6 Ola Sundell

30 May 2002

• 00:40   Re: Polygons passed to poly_overlap have 0 pts when Kenneth Chan
• 02:05   self-tuning histograms Neil Conway
• 02:50   Re: self-tuning histograms Gavin Sherry
• 02:59   Re: ipv6 Tom Lane
• 03:43   Re: self-tuning histograms Neil Conway
• 09:13   Re: Null values in indexes Oleg Bartunov
• 11:23   Re: Replication status Andrew Sullivan
• 12:05   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Alessio Bragadini
• 12:21   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Joel Burton
• 12:58   Re: Null values in indexes Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Tom Lane
• 13:57   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Joel Burton
• 15:14   Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: self-tuning histograms Tom Lane
• 19:28   finding medians Josh Burdick
• 19:37   Re: finding medians Josh Berkus
• 19:53   Re: finding medians Dann Corbit
• 20:16   Re: finding medians Dann Corbit
• 20:33   Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Katherine Ward
• 20:46   Re: finding medians Tom Lane
• 21:07   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 21:21   Re: finding medians Hannu Krosing
• 21:28   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: finding medians Dann Corbit
• 21:37   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Dann Corbit
• 21:47   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Tom Lane
• 23:03   Re: Perl build fix attempted Tom Lane

31 May 2002

• 12:11   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Jan Wieck
• 12:43   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Thomas Lockhart
• 14:59   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Thomas Lockhart
• 16:21   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 16:24   Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port Tom Lane
• 20:48   Can't import large objects in most recent cvs (20020531 -- approx 1pm PDT) Ron Snyder
• 21:24   Re: Can't import large objects in most recent cvs (20020531 -- approx 1pm PDT) Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: Can't import large objects in most recent cvs (2002 Ron Snyder