Tom Lane wrote:
> where "kill the index entry" involves informing the index AM that it can
> somehow mark the index entry uninteresting and not to be returned at all
> during future indexscans. (For performance reasons this'll probably get
> merged into the next "get next index tuple" operation, but that remains
> to be designed in detail.)
>
> Comments?
>
Is this a step toward being able to VACUUM indexes?
Joe
