Re: Indexscan API cleanup proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Indexscan API cleanup proposal
Date
Msg-id 11648.1021848749@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indexscan API cleanup proposal  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses getting oid of tuple in executePlan  (Dhruv Pilania <dhruv@cs.sunysb.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> where "kill the index entry" involves informing the index AM that it can
>> somehow mark the index entry uninteresting and not to be returned at all
>> during future indexscans.

> Is this a step toward being able to VACUUM indexes?

You mean collapse indexes?  No, that's an entirely different issue.
This is about reducing scan overhead when an index contains lots of
pointers to dead-but-not-yet-vacuumed tuples.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexscan API cleanup proposal
Next
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: SASL, compression?