Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug
Date
Msg-id 200205211847.05321.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug  (Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug  (Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 06:09 pm, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 18:24, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > In any case, this isn't just a Red Hat problem, as it's going to cause
> > problems with the use of timestamps on ANY glibc 2.2.5 dist.  That's more
> > than Red Hat, by a large margin.

> I'm running glibc 2.2.5 on Debian and all regression tests pass OK (with
> make check).  I don't see any note in the glibc Debian changelog about
> reversing an upstream change to mktime().

> I missed the first messages in this thread and I can't find them in the
> archive.  What should I be looking for to see if I have the problem you
> have encountered or to see why I don't have it if I ought to have?

Hmmm.  Compile and run the attached program.  If you get -1, it's the new 
behavior.  It might be interesting to see the differences here.....
-- 
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Shouldn't large objects be MVCC-aware?
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is 7.3 a good time to increase NAMEDATALEN ?