Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1
Date
Msg-id 23210.1020780289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1  (<jack@floatingdoghead.net>)
Responses ...  (Shra <shravan@yaskatech.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<jack@floatingdoghead.net> writes:
> Aside from being a near-universal "best practice", it makes it easier for
> someone to analyze whether local patches to 7.2.1 conflict with work that
> the team has committed.

There is a 7.2 branch, and I would think that the tip of that branch is
generally what you are interested in if you do not want the HEAD tip.

Applying a tag to indicate exactly what state of that branch got
released as 7.2.1 would be good from a historical-documentation
point of view, but I can't see that it has any direct relevance
for either current development or maintenance work.

Of course, the real answer to your question is that Marc Fournier does
that work, and the rest of us long ago gave up trying to get him to be
perfectly consistent in his tagging practices ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: OK, lets talk portability.
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: OK, lets talk portability.