Bear Giles <bgiles@coyotesong.com> writes:
> But the problem is that knowledgeable security administrators can
> replace the common hardcoded values with their own. How do you allow
> this to be easily done?
Configuration parameters?
> One possibility that occured to me was that dynamic libraries would
> handle this nicely. There's even some support for dynamic libraries
> in the user-defined functions, so this wouldn't be a totally
> unprecedented idea.
> But this would be a new way of using dynamic libraries.
You've lost me completely. What exactly are you suggesting?
regards, tom lane
