Re: OK, lets talk portability. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: OK, lets talk portability.
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKEHPCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OK, lets talk portability.  (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Just a note:

Apache 2.0.36 just released and this is in the release notes:
 *) Deprecated the apr_lock.h API. Please see the following files    for the improved thread and process locking and
signaling:    apr_proc_mutex.h, apr_thread_mutex.h, apr_thread_rwlock.h,    apr_thread_cond.h, and apr_global_mutex.h.
[AaronBannert]
 

Chris

> > By the time of the fork(), not much has been done.  Some needed
> > calculations can simply be stored into shared memory (which is trivial
> > to implement).  Some other tasks can simply be executed by the cloned
> > process, exactly as they were executed in the server.
> > 
> > Using fork() on Win32 is pointless, hopless, awful.  Don't even think
> > about it.  It's a death warrant.
> 
> Preaching to the choir my friend.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ryan Bradetich
Date:
Subject: Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: code contribution