Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date
Msg-id 20020506104210.E32524-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> >> We could get around this, of course: record the port number in the data
> >> directory lockfile, and test for existence of the old socket
> >> independently of trying to create a new one.  But it seems ugly.
>
> > How about a second, data directory based socket simply named something
> > like '.inuse', that is not port dependent?
>
> Hmm ... but how do you use that to tell if there are still backends
> around?

As a backend is started up, connect to that socket ... if socket is open
when trying to start a new frontend, fail as there are currently other
connections attached to it?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports