Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date
Msg-id 4779.1020692436@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
>> We could get around this, of course: record the port number in the data
>> directory lockfile, and test for existence of the old socket
>> independently of trying to create a new one.  But it seems ugly.

> How about a second, data directory based socket simply named something
> like '.inuse', that is not port dependent?

Hmm ... but how do you use that to tell if there are still backends
around?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports