On Thursday 09 May 2002 07:51 am, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
> > > license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
> > > development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
> > Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a
> > separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group?
> Ummmm ... no? We tend to be anti-GPL over here, since its anti-business
> ... gborg would be a good place for any of this ...
I can see my feeble attempt at humor fell flat. Sorry.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
