On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 19:23, mlw wrote:
> Lee Kindness wrote:
>
> >
> > Sure It'd be nice to have a native PostgreSQL on XP Server (I don't
> > see the point in consumer level Microsoft OSs) but how high is the
> > demand? What's the prize? What are the current limitations - fork,
> > semaphores, ugly interface...?
>
> The demand for PostgreSQL on Windows is currently as near to zero as you can
> imagine. This is probably because there is no viable PostgreSQL on Windows.
>
> If written correctly, a Win32 version of PostgreSQL would rock the Windows
> world. I see no reason why it would be limted to the "professional" version.
> Hell, it could even run on Windows 98.
Perhaps we could simpultaneously solve another problem - creating a
singlethreaded embeddable version of postgresql "engine"
-------------
Hannu
