Mark (mlw) ... could you generate a listing of those variables you feel
would need to be moved to a 'global structure' and post that to the list?
That would at least give us a starting point, instead of both sides
guessing at what is/would be involved ...
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes:
> > As I understood it the idea was to put the stuff, the
> > backends inherit from the postmaster, into a centralized
> > place, instead of having it spread out all over the place.
> > What's wrong with that?
>
> The main objection to it in my mind is that what had been private
> variables in specific modules now become exceedingly public. Instead of
> looking at "static int foo" and *knowing* that all the references are in
> the current file, you have to go trolling the entire backend to see who
> is referencing pg_globals.foo.
>
> I have not counted to see how many variables are really affected; if
> there's only a few then it doesn't matter much. But the people who
> have done this so far have all reported inserting tons of #ifdefs,
> which leads me to the assumption that there's a lot of 'em.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
