Re: More schema queries - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Dave Page
Subject Re: More schema queries
Date
Msg-id D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF6101529C@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: More schema queries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 20 May 2002 15:16
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: More schema queries
>
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> > gcc -g -o postgres.exe -Wl,--base-file,postgres.base postgres.exp
> > access/SUBSYS.o bootstrap/SUBSYS.o catalog/SUBSYS.o parser/SUBSYS.o
> > commands/SUBSYS.o executor /SUBSYS.o lib/SUBSYS.o libpq/SUBSYS.o
> > main/SUBSYS.o nodes/SUBSYS.o optimizer/SUBSYS.o port/SUBSYS.o
> > postmaster/SUBSYS.o regex/SUBSYS.o rewrite/SUBSYS.o
> storage/ SUBSYS.o
> > tcop/SUBSYS.o utils/SUBSYS.o -lcygipc -lcrypt
> > access/SUBSYS.o(.text+0x13):heaptuple.c: undefined reference to
> > `mcount'
>
> On Unix it's necessary for the link step to include a -pg
> switch, just like the compile steps.  This is evidently not
> happening in the Windows case.
>
> In the Unix case, $(PROFILE) gets incorporated into
> $(LDFLAGS) in src/Makefile.global, and then
> src/backend/Makefile uses $(LDFLAGS) in the backend link rule
> (line 40 in current source).  I don't see any inclusion of
> flags at all in the Windows link rule at lines 48, 50.
> Presumably these ought to at least mention $(PROFILE), and I
> wonder whether they should not say $(LDFLAGS).
>
> Please check it out and submit a patch...

Attached (& CC'd to -patches). It all built OK with this, so I'll go off
and play with initdb & gprof now.

Regards, Dave.

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bear Giles
Date:
Subject: revised SSL patches
Next
From: Bear Giles
Date:
Subject: First cut at mkcert