Re: ksqo? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ksqo?
Date
Msg-id 393.1022104987@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ksqo?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Responses Re: ksqo?
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> The current KSQO code is currently #ifdef'ed out, and the 'ksqo' GUC
> variable does nothing. Is there a reason for keeping this code around?
> (or conversely, what was the original justification for disabling it?)

I disabled it because I didn't have time to fix it properly when it got
broken by the 7.1 rewrite of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT.  I've been waiting
to see whether anyone notices that it's gone ;-).  So far the demand for
it has been invisible, so it hasn't gotten fixed.  On the other hand
I'm not quite convinced that it never will get fixed, so I haven't
applied the coup de grace.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Me in California