Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 16:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we used PID then we'd eventually have 64K (or whatever the range of
>> PIDs is on your platform) different pg_temp_nnn entries cluttering
>> pg_namespace.

> Should they not be cleaned up at backend exit even when they are in
> range 1..MaxBackends ?

Hm.  We currently remove the schema contents (ie the temp tables) but
not the pg_namespace entry itself.  Seems like deleting that only to
have to recreate it would be a waste of cycles.
        regards, tom lane