Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Date
Msg-id 21723.1020194893@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
List pgsql-general
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info> writes:
> ... In any case, I can't offer a definite
> answer about the 64-bit qsort for now.

Do you need to profile it?  It seemed that the 32-bit behavior for
many-equal-keys was so bad that it'd be easy to tell whether it's
fixed, just by rough overall timing of a test case...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: stuck spinlock
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: PL/j - java stored procedures