On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 07:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> You have no fear that that "sed" will substitute some places it
> shouldn't have? Also, what makes you think this'll be a "rarely
> used" feature? I'd guess that people load dumps every day into
> databases that have different names than the ones they dumped from.
> Don't see why the same is not likely to be true at the schema level.
A pg_restore option would presumably be more reliable than sed.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for thou art with me;
thyrod and thy staff they comfort me." Psalms 23:4
