pgaccess.org - invitation for a working meeting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Iavor Raytchev
Subject pgaccess.org - invitation for a working meeting
Date
Msg-id HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGCEDJCGAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pgaccess.org - invitation for a working meeting  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello everybody,

I personally had enough discussions during the last few days. I want to
thank everybody who expressed their opinion and to remind you all that we
started as a small group of four people who actively use and patch pgaccess
now, asked by Teo to see what we can do about bringing our patches together.

I do not feel like moderating a pgaccess war.

My opinion is that some of the last postings are by people who have not
followed the whole discussion from the start, and also some go into
problems - too distant for the current fragile day.

With this message I would like to invite all people who have fresh patches
(newer than one year) and all people who are interesting in working and/or
supporting pgaccess now (during the next few weeks) to send a signal during
the weekend.

And all the rest to be quite for a while.

I want on Monday to proceed and to merge at least the code we produced in
our company with the latest pgaccess that can be found and with the code of
Chris and Bartus.

And to see if and how we (Chris, Bartus, Boyan, Teo and myself, plus all
active people who send a signal) can work together.

I think it is clear that pgaccess is for PostgreSQL, that nobody wants to
take it away or to kill it.

After we do this small step next week and 'show some code' to Peter
Eisentraut, we can think how is best to make it available for the PostgreSQL
users.

And how to continue.

I think some of you want too much from a half asleep project. Let it wake
up, let is see on which earth it is. And let it then decide.

Thanks,

Iavor

--
www.pgaccess.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: internal voting
Next
From: "Iavor Raytchev"
Date:
Subject: Re: internal voting