Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Burton
Subject Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date
Msg-id JGEPJNMCKODMDHGOBKDNKEMKCMAA.joel@joelburton.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:07 PM
> To: mlw
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
>
>
> Rather than propagating the SysV semaphore API still further, why don't
> we kill it now?  (I'm willing to keep the shmem API, however.)

Would this have the benefit of allow PostgreSQL to work properly in BSD
jails, since lack of really working SysV IPC was the problem there?

- J.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Auto-reload of dynamic libraries
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime