Joel Burton wrote:
> Certainly, we don't need all of cygwin (eg bison, gcc, perl, et al). We'd
> need the dll, sh, rm, and few other things. I'm not sure if it would need to
> be in the standard cygwin file structure; I know that you can reconfigure
> this when you use cygwin (I used to). In any event, instead of having to
> have a novice pick & guess which of >100 packages they need, we could put
> together the 5 or 6 they need.
Oh, BTW, had anyone luck with loading of user defined C functions or the PL handlers under CygWin? I
remember having had trouble with that. When the C function uses global variables in the backend, things get
abit messy.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
