Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug
Date
Msg-id 20020525195501.GF1617@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:15:47PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> This is getting silly.  Does nobody here understand that the release

Yes, but I'm not sure on which side.

> number is local for each distribution.  Comparing them does not lead to

No, this is simply not true. The version number is what the upstream
gives its release. No more no less. What RH does is becoming as subtly
incompatible a possible. If that's the goal, it doesn't look like free
software for me. Sure all changes are published, but why forcing this
kind of difference between linux distributions? Why not calling it 2.2.6
or something if there has to be some changes that are not compatible?

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Internal flowchart