Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> > Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> > be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> > doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.
>
> Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
> query, even if only subtly. But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
> someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...
If it does nothing, we certainly should remove it from GUC so people
don't see a meaningless option. We can then keep it in CVS to see if we
want it later.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
