Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)
Date
Msg-id 4256.1019626801@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Responses Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> ...Based on that data, I'd vote against making any changes to NAMEDATALEN.

It looked to me like the cost for going to NAMEDATALEN = 64 would be
reasonable.  Based on these numbers I'd have a problem with 128 or more.

But as you observe, pgbench numbers are not very repeatable.  It'd be
nice to have some similar experiments with another benchmark before
making a decision.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction