Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0204240140230.688-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
List pgsql-hackers
This patch does not compile correctly:

pg_backup_archiver.c: In function `ahwrite':
pg_backup_archiver.c:1252: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
pg_backup_archiver.c:1259: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
pg_backup_archiver.c:1263: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
make: *** [pg_backup_archiver.o] Error 1


Bruce Momjian writes:

>
> Patch applied.  Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Mario Weilguni wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 11. April 2002 17:44 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > > "Mario Weilguni" <mario.weilguni@icomedias.com> writes:
> > > > And I did not find out how I can detect the large object
> > > > chunksize, either from getting it from the headers (include
> > > > "storage/large_object.h" did not work)
> > >
> >
> > You did not answer if it's ok to post the patch, hope it's ok:
>
>

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nicolas Bazin"
Date:
Subject: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)