Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Loftis
Subject Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Date
Msg-id 3CC6EC5F.8080906@wgops.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vote on SET in aborted transaction  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Vote number 1 -- ROLL BACK

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>OK, would people please vote on how to handle SET in an aborted
>transaction?  This vote will allow us to resolve the issue and move
>forward if needed.
>
>In the case of:
>
>    SET x=1;
>    BEGIN;
>    SET x=2;
>    query_that_aborts_transaction;
>    SET x=3;
>    COMMIT;
>
>at the end, should 'x' equal:
>    
>    1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction
>    2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort
>    3 - All SETs are honored in aborted transaction
>    ? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable
>
>Our current behavior is 2.
>
>Please vote and I will tally the results.
>




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mario Weilguni
Date:
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: "make report"