Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mario Weilguni
Subject Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date
Msg-id 200204241902.49852.mario.weilguni@icomedias.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Mittwoch, 24. April 2002 16:03 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> OK, I have applied the following patch to fix these warnings.  However,
> I need Mario to confirm these are the right changes.  Thanks.

I've checked it and works fine, but the memcpy() prototype says it should be
void pointers. Will this give errors with non-gcc compilers?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Parser translations and schemas
Next
From: Michael Loftis
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction