Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Sure should it! You gave an example for the need to roll
> > > back, because
> > > otherwise you would end up with an invalid
> > > search path "foo".
> >
> > What's wrong with it ? The insert command after *rollback*
> > would fail. It seems the right thing to me. Otherwise
> > the insert command would try to append the data of the
> > table t1 to itself. The insert command is for copying
> > schema1.t1 to foo.t1 in case the previous create schema
> > command suceeded.
>
> Wrong about your entire example is that the rollback is sheer
> wrong placed to make up your case ;-p
Is this issue on the wrong(? not preferable) sequnence
of calls ?
Please don't miss the point.
regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
