Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date
Msg-id 3CC76533.4ABCD53C@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > Must I understand this from your previous posting
> > (2 says roll back only after transaction aborts,)
> > or original posting ? What I understood was 2 only
> > says that SET fails between a failure and the
> > subsequenct ROLLBACK call.
> 
> Yes, 2 says that SET fails between failure query and COMMIT/ROLLBACK
> call, which is current behavior.

Oh I see. It was my mistake to have participated this vote.
I'm not qualified from the first because I wasn't able to
understand your vote list. 

regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Loftis
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction