Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id 200204060132.g361WlN05079@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: timeout implementation issues  (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Or, as I suggested above, extend the SELECT (and other querys?) syntax
> seems reasonable. More so than the non-standard 'use this index, really'
> types of extensions that other RDBMSs provide, that we've rightly avoided.

I think we need timeout for all statement.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues