Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Date
Msg-id 28143.1018144735@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Why shouldn't aggregate functions have entries in pg_proc?

> Furthermore, we could make the new function privileges apply to aggregates
> as well.

Good point.  Another thing that would fall out for free is that the
aggregate type-coercion rules would become exactly like the function
type-coercion rules; right now they are a tad stupider.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues