Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0204061748070.683-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Why shouldn't aggregate functions have entries in pg_proc?  Then one
> search would cover both possibilities, and we could eliminate some
> duplicate code in the parser.

Furthermore, we could make the new function privileges apply to aggregates
as well.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jessica Perry Hekman
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues