Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id 20020408102935.B3729@zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:13:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> It seems clear to me that SET *should* roll back on abort.  Just a
> matter of how important is it to fix.
I want control on this :-)

   SET valname = 'vatdata' ON ROLLBACK UNSET;   or      SET valname = 'vatdata';   
       Karel
-- Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz,
http://mape.jcu.cz


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues