Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date
Msg-id 6904.1018844818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I recall that this was the behavior we agreed we wanted.  IMHO, it would
> be conditional on the INSERT ... VALUES (DEFAULT) capability being
> provided.  I'm not sure if that is there yet.

That is there now.  Do you recall when this was discussed before?
I couldn't remember if there'd been any real discussion or not.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bug with current sources? Re: cost of parse/plan/execute for one sample query
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts