Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.40.0204150536001.24788-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I recall that this was the behavior we agreed we wanted.  IMHO, it would
> > be conditional on the INSERT ... VALUES (DEFAULT) capability being
> > provided.  I'm not sure if that is there yet.
>
> That is there now.  Do you recall when this was discussed before?
> I couldn't remember if there'd been any real discussion or not.

It has to be at least a year, Tom.  I brought it up in hackers after
I got bit by it.  I had a rather long insert statement and missed a
value in the middle somewhere which shifted everything by one.  It
was agreed that it shouldn't happen but I don't recall what else was
decided.

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net        56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking       Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com      Online Giftshop Superstore
http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mario Weilguni"
Date:
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: deletion of attributes