Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date
Msg-id 200204152003.g3FK3ei16860@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > > I recall that this was the behavior we agreed we wanted.  IMHO, it would
> > > be conditional on the INSERT ... VALUES (DEFAULT) capability being
> > > provided.  I'm not sure if that is there yet.
> >
> > That is there now.  Do you recall when this was discussed before?
> > I couldn't remember if there'd been any real discussion or not.
> 
> It has to be at least a year, Tom.  I brought it up in hackers after
> I got bit by it.  I had a rather long insert statement and missed a
> value in the middle somewhere which shifted everything by one.  It
> was agreed that it shouldn't happen but I don't recall what else was
> decided.

Yes, I do remember Vince's comment, and I do believe that is the time it
was added.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts