Re: Suggestion for optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: Suggestion for optimization
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0204072221460.4673-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestion for optimization  (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>)
Responses Re: Suggestion for optimization  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Barry Lind wrote:

> Af far as I know Oracle doesn't have any short cut (along the lines of 
> what is being discussed in this thread) for this operation.  However 
> Oracle is more efficient in providing the answer than postgres currently 
> is.  While postgres needs to perform a full scan on the table, Oracle 
> will only need to perform a full index scan on the primary key if one 
> exists.  Since the index will likely have much less data than the full 

Under Postgres, a full index scan is generally more expensive than a full
table scan since indices, particularly btree, carry a large amount of meta
data and theefore consume more pages.

Gavin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kjartan Бsюуrsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexing and regular expressions
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion for optimization