Re: Suggestion for optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Suggestion for optimization
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEABCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestion for optimization  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
Responses Re: Suggestion for optimization  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Af far as I know Oracle doesn't have any short cut (along the lines of
> > what is being discussed in this thread) for this operation.  However
> > Oracle is more efficient in providing the answer than postgres
> currently
> > is.  While postgres needs to perform a full scan on the table, Oracle
> > will only need to perform a full index scan on the primary key if one
> > exists.  Since the index will likely have much less data than the full
>
> Under Postgres, a full index scan is generally more expensive than a full
> table scan since indices, particularly btree, carry a large amount of meta
> data and theefore consume more pages.

Don't forget that Postgres also doesn't store tids in the index, so must
always check with the main table that a row is visible in current
transaction.

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Question on ident authorization
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate