> Actually I'm in favor of it. I have a proposal outstanding to require
> constraints to have names that are unique per-table, for consistency
> with triggers (already are that way) and rules (will become that way,
> rather than having globally unique names as now). AFAIR the only
> significant concern was making sure that the system wouldn't generate
> duplicate constraint names by default.
Yeah, that's what's giving me pain - foreign key names are generated in the
rewriter or something somewhere, so I'm not sure exactly what I have access
to for checking duplicates...
The other interesting issue is the the little suffix we append is just in
the name. ie. someone can create an index called '_pkey' and cause
confusion.
Chris
