Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, I think we were talking at cross-purposes then. What you're really
> unhappy about is that this uses a list of two-element sublists? Yeah,
> I agree, that's a messy data structure; a list of DefElem would be
> perhaps cleaner. Not sure if it matters all that much though, since the
> list only exists in the context of a few productions in gram.y. Perhaps
> adding a couple of lines of documentation would be better than changing
> the code.
Yea, documenation and/or a list of DefElem would be nicer. The problem
is that people are going to copy this in the future, so I may as well do
it right. Can't take more than 20 minutes.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
