Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date
Msg-id 526.1020106167@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction  (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes:
>     I  don't  really  get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a
>     clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour, as  the
>     winner.    Maybe   I   missed   something,  but  what's  this
>     disscussion about?

We agreed on transactional behavior ... but Scott is proposing a variant
that was not considered earlier, and it seems worth considering.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacation in May
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction