Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date
Msg-id 20020429155155.C15173-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction  (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > What happens inside of a nested transaction, assuming we do have those
> > evenually ... ?
>
> Folks,
>
>     I  don't  really  get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a
>     clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour, as  the
>     winner.    Maybe   I   missed   something,  but  what's  this
>     disscussion about?

This discussion is about a #4 option that nobody considered ...




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Syscache/relcache invalidation event callbacks