Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOECGCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Anyway, how does one measure the perfomance impact of such a change?
> > By merely changing the constant definition, or also by actually using
> > long identifiers? I can do that if it's of any help, for various values
> > perhaps.
>
> I think I would measure disk size change in a newly created database,
> and run regression for various values.  That uses a lot of identifier
> lookups.

With schemas, maybe there'd be less name lookups and comparisons anyway,
since there's more reliance on oids instead of names?

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data