Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id 3785.1018448031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
Responses Re: timeout implementation issues
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> I do have a concern about how to implement some of the SET commands if
> we *do* respect transactional semantics. For example, SET TIME ZONE
> saves the current value of an environment variable (if available), and
> would need *at least* a "before transaction" and "after transaction
> started" pair of values.

I intended for guc.c to manage this bookkeeping, thus freeing individual
modules from worrying about it.  That would require us to transpose the
last few special-cased SET variables into generic GUC variables, but
I consider that a Good Thing anyway.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: A "New Release" list of places to contact about new releases of PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate