Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lee Kindness
Subject Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date
Msg-id 15561.5068.40814.285016@kelvin.csl.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier writes:> Myself, I wonder why Oracle went the route they went ... does anyone have> access to a Sybase
/Informix system, to confirm how they do it?  Is> Oracle the 'odd man out', or are we going to be that?  *Adding*
something>(ie. DROP TABLE rollbacks) that nobody appears to have is one thing ...> but changing the behaviour is a
totallydifferent ..
 

FWIW, Ingres also doesn't rollback SET. However all its SET
functionality is the sort of stuff you wouldn't assume to rollback:
auto-commitconnectionjournalingloggingsessionwork locationsmaxidle

You cannot do something sane like modify the date output through SET.

Lee.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_constraint
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL -> Replication