Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tycho Fruru
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0204102010090.7682-100000@perycles.unix.be.EU.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-general
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > Have you found out _what_ exaclty is patented ?
> >
> > Is it just his concrete implementation of "UB-Tree" or something
> > broader, like using one multi-dimensional index instead of multiple
> > one-dimensional ones ?

(I know it is OT, please reply in private, I can summarize any reactions
to the list ...)

Patents are supposed to be only applicable to an industrial application
(with external side-effects).  So ideas in themselves are not patentable.

Anyway, this is once more a good example of the danger of software patents
- you know what to reply when people say "software patents promote
innovation"

IANAL, just my 0,02 Euro.

see also : http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/savingeurope.html (also
interesting for non-europeans, of course !)

--
Tycho Fruru            tycho.fruru@conostix.com
"Prediction is extremely difficult. Especially about the future."
  - Niels Bohr


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Loftis
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]
Next
From: "gustavo Berns"
Date:
Subject: I would preffer that postgresql start with the flag -i