> > Will we be able to accomplish the equivelent of the below?
>
> I think what you're depicting is the equivalent of a schema owner
> dropping a table in his schema, right? Yes, I proposed allowing
that,
Yes, thats what I was looking for. Sorry if I missed that in the
initial proposal.
> > Yes, basically what we do now. I'm hoping to add the ability to
> > enable a group (ROLES) to have ownership of items as well as users
> > when I complete the other tasks I've set before myself.
>
> That could be a good extension, but I think it's orthogonal to the
> immediate issue...
Yes it is.
